TY - JOUR
T1 - Age-related slowing, S-R compatibility, and stages of information processing
AU - Diggles-Buckles, Virginia
AU - Vercruyssen, Max
PY - 1990/1/1
Y1 - 1990/1/1
N2 - Previous work in this laboratory (Vercruyssen, Carlton & Diggles-Buckles, 1989) has found that older individuals are at a disproportional disadvantage when stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility were manipulated, age interacted with the S-R manipulation, suggesting in an additive factors framework that the locus of age-related slowing was the response selection stage. In that study S-R compatibility was manipulated by changing the S-R spatial map as well as changing the environment (subjects were required to cross their arms). The present study attempted to tease apart factors that might be contributing to that age x S-R compatibility relationship by using S-R maps of simple, moderate, and high difficulty as one factor and the arm position (crossed or uncrossed, a test of the Simon effect (Simon, Sly & Vilapakkam, 1981) as a different factor. In addition, stimulus quality was manipulated as a factor in this 4 factor design: age x stimulus quality x S-R map x arm position. Results revealed that both factors, S-R compatibility and arm position interacted with age. The conclusion from an additive factors perspective is that the stages of decision making (S-R compatibility) and response preparation (arm position) show age-dependent slowing whereas the stimulus encoding stage (stimulus quality) does not.
AB - Previous work in this laboratory (Vercruyssen, Carlton & Diggles-Buckles, 1989) has found that older individuals are at a disproportional disadvantage when stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility were manipulated, age interacted with the S-R manipulation, suggesting in an additive factors framework that the locus of age-related slowing was the response selection stage. In that study S-R compatibility was manipulated by changing the S-R spatial map as well as changing the environment (subjects were required to cross their arms). The present study attempted to tease apart factors that might be contributing to that age x S-R compatibility relationship by using S-R maps of simple, moderate, and high difficulty as one factor and the arm position (crossed or uncrossed, a test of the Simon effect (Simon, Sly & Vilapakkam, 1981) as a different factor. In addition, stimulus quality was manipulated as a factor in this 4 factor design: age x stimulus quality x S-R map x arm position. Results revealed that both factors, S-R compatibility and arm position interacted with age. The conclusion from an additive factors perspective is that the stages of decision making (S-R compatibility) and response preparation (arm position) show age-dependent slowing whereas the stimulus encoding stage (stimulus quality) does not.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025551891&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/154193129003400206
DO - 10.1177/154193129003400206
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:0025551891
SN - 0163-5182
SP - 154
EP - 157
JO - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society
JF - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society
T2 - Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting - Orlando '90
Y2 - 8 October 1990 through 12 October 1990
ER -