Against Repeatable Artworks

Allan Hazlett

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

There seem to be repeatable artworks. Plays and musical works (like Hamlet or 'Pictures at an Exhibition') can be performed again and again; installations (like Sol LeWitt's Wall Drawing #260) can be installed over and over; culinary dishes (like Jean-George Vongerichten's tuna tartare) can be prepared many times. This chapter offers an argument against the existence of repeatable artworks. First, the chapter argues that an artwork is repeatable only if it is an abstract object. This jives with standard accounts of repeatable works, which take them to be abstracta. Second, it argues that abstract objects must have all their properties essentially. Finally, since repeatable artworks, if there are any, do not have all their properties essentially, the chapter concludes that there are no repeatable artworks.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationArt and Abstract Objects
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191746277
ISBN (Print)9780199691494
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 24 2013

Keywords

  • Abstract objects
  • Artworks
  • Conceptual art
  • Essential properties
  • Musical works
  • Ontology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Against Repeatable Artworks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this