TY - JOUR
T1 - African American Patients' Perspectives on Determinants of Hemodialysis Adherence and Use of Motivational Interviewing to Improve Hemodialysis Adherence
AU - Bonnet, Kemberlee
AU - Bergner, Erin M.
AU - Ma, Melissa
AU - Taylor, Kathryn
AU - Desantis, Emily
AU - Pena, Maria A.
AU - Henry-Okafor, Queen
AU - Liddell, Toddra
AU - Nair, Devika
AU - Fissell, Rachel
AU - Iwelunmor, Juliet
AU - Airhihenbuwa, Collins
AU - Merighi, Joseph
AU - Resnicow, Kenneth
AU - Wolever, Ruth Q.
AU - Cavanaugh, Kerri L.
AU - Schlundt, David
AU - Umeukeje, Ebele M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.on behalf of the American Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Key PointsAfrican American patients have unique insights on hemodialysis adherence and use of motivational interviewing to promote adherence.Key themes were mental health issues; historical mistrust; social determinants of health; and importance of provider cultural competence.Themes led to a novel conceptual model, which will inform the design of a motivational interviewing-based protocol to improve adherence.BackgroundCompared with White patients, African American (AA) patients have a four-fold higher prevalence of kidney failure and higher hemodialysis nonadherence. Adherence behaviors are influenced by psychosocial factors, including personal meaning of a behavior and self-confidence to enact it. We assessed perspectives of AA hemodialysis patients on unique factors affecting dialysis adherence, and use of motivational interviewing (MI), an evidence-based intervention, to improve these factors, dialysis adherence, and outcomes in AAs.MethodsSelf-identified AA hemodialysis patients (N=22) watched a brief video describing MI and then completed a semistructured interview or focus group session. Interview questions explored unique barriers and facilitators of hemodialysis adherence in AAs and perceived utility of MI to address these obstacles. Verbatim transcripts and an iterative inductive/deductive approach were used to develop a hierarchical coding system. Three experienced coders independently coded the same two transcripts. Coding was compared, and discrepancies were reconciled by a fourth coder or consensus. Transcripts, quotations, and codes were managed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS version 28.0.ResultsThemes and subthemes emerged and culminated in a novel conceptual model informed by three theoretical models of behavior change: Theory of Self-Care Management for Vulnerable Populations; Social Cognitive Theory; and Self Determination Theory. This conceptual model will inform the design of a culturally tailored, MI-based intervention to improve dialysis adherence in AAs.ConclusionsIntegrating AA hemodialysis patient perspectives is critical for enhancing dialysis care delivery and the design of effective interventions such as MI to improve dialysis adherence in AA and promote kidney health equity. AA hemodialysis patients view MI as a tool to clarify patient priorities, build trust, and promote patient-provider therapeutic alliance. Cultural tailoring of MI to address unique barriers of AAs with kidney failure will improve adherence and health outcomes in these vulnerable patients.
AB - Key PointsAfrican American patients have unique insights on hemodialysis adherence and use of motivational interviewing to promote adherence.Key themes were mental health issues; historical mistrust; social determinants of health; and importance of provider cultural competence.Themes led to a novel conceptual model, which will inform the design of a motivational interviewing-based protocol to improve adherence.BackgroundCompared with White patients, African American (AA) patients have a four-fold higher prevalence of kidney failure and higher hemodialysis nonadherence. Adherence behaviors are influenced by psychosocial factors, including personal meaning of a behavior and self-confidence to enact it. We assessed perspectives of AA hemodialysis patients on unique factors affecting dialysis adherence, and use of motivational interviewing (MI), an evidence-based intervention, to improve these factors, dialysis adherence, and outcomes in AAs.MethodsSelf-identified AA hemodialysis patients (N=22) watched a brief video describing MI and then completed a semistructured interview or focus group session. Interview questions explored unique barriers and facilitators of hemodialysis adherence in AAs and perceived utility of MI to address these obstacles. Verbatim transcripts and an iterative inductive/deductive approach were used to develop a hierarchical coding system. Three experienced coders independently coded the same two transcripts. Coding was compared, and discrepancies were reconciled by a fourth coder or consensus. Transcripts, quotations, and codes were managed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS version 28.0.ResultsThemes and subthemes emerged and culminated in a novel conceptual model informed by three theoretical models of behavior change: Theory of Self-Care Management for Vulnerable Populations; Social Cognitive Theory; and Self Determination Theory. This conceptual model will inform the design of a culturally tailored, MI-based intervention to improve dialysis adherence in AAs.ConclusionsIntegrating AA hemodialysis patient perspectives is critical for enhancing dialysis care delivery and the design of effective interventions such as MI to improve dialysis adherence in AA and promote kidney health equity. AA hemodialysis patients view MI as a tool to clarify patient priorities, build trust, and promote patient-provider therapeutic alliance. Cultural tailoring of MI to address unique barriers of AAs with kidney failure will improve adherence and health outcomes in these vulnerable patients.
KW - ESKD
KW - dialysis
KW - health equity, diversity, and inclusion
KW - hemodialysis
KW - kidney failure
KW - patient-centered care
KW - renal failure
KW - social determinants of health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85207631407&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2215/CJN.0000000580
DO - 10.2215/CJN.0000000580
M3 - Article
C2 - 39412894
AN - SCOPUS:85207631407
SN - 1555-9041
VL - 20
SP - 88
EP - 100
JO - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
JF - Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
IS - 1
ER -