TY - JOUR
T1 - Adult Quality of Life Post Cleft Palate Repair
T2 - A Comparison of Two Techniques
AU - Skladman, Rachel
AU - Grames, Lynn Marty
AU - Skolnick, Gary
AU - Nguyen, Dennis C.
AU - Naidoo, Sybill D.
AU - Patel, Kamlesh B.
AU - Marsh, Jeffrey L.
AU - Woo, Albert S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
PY - 2017/6/1
Y1 - 2017/6/1
N2 - Background and Purpose: In 1989, the Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal published the first randomized prospective cleft surgery study, comparing the Kriens intravelar veloplasty (IVV) with a non-IVV 2-flap repair. Results in that and follow-up publications yielded no difference between the 2 groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. The subjects have now reached adulthood. This study was designed to ask: Is there any difference between the groups in the outcomes that multidisciplinary team care addresses: speech intelligibility, facial growth, breathing while awake and asleep, attainment of education, and long-term socioeconomic status? Methods: Enrollees from the original published study were invited to participate in a survey. Subjects responded to questions about speech therapy and speech satisfaction, additional surgery, breathing patterns, sleep quality/sleep disorder, and dental occlusion. Demographic information, information on education level, profession, and socio-economic status were queried. Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare results. Results: Forty-two of the original 200 patients (20 Kriens IVV and 19 non-IVV) chose to participate. Average age at survey was 25±3 years. Analysis yielded no difference between the 2 respondent groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. There were no differences in speech outcome and satisfaction (8 questions, 0.30 < P<0.97), sleep concerns (3 questions, 0.16 < P<0.39), and dental occlusion (P=0.69). Equivalent proportions of the 2 groups had been in speech therapy (P=0.22). There was no difference in education attainment of the 2 groups (P=0.26). Conclusions: The original randomized prospective trial suggested that there was no difference between the 2 surgery types in need for secondary velopharyngeal management. This long-term survey study on the same group of patients suggests that in young adulthood, the 2 groups have similar outcomes in terms of education, career choice, speech satisfaction, dental occlusion, and sleep disorder.
AB - Background and Purpose: In 1989, the Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal published the first randomized prospective cleft surgery study, comparing the Kriens intravelar veloplasty (IVV) with a non-IVV 2-flap repair. Results in that and follow-up publications yielded no difference between the 2 groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. The subjects have now reached adulthood. This study was designed to ask: Is there any difference between the groups in the outcomes that multidisciplinary team care addresses: speech intelligibility, facial growth, breathing while awake and asleep, attainment of education, and long-term socioeconomic status? Methods: Enrollees from the original published study were invited to participate in a survey. Subjects responded to questions about speech therapy and speech satisfaction, additional surgery, breathing patterns, sleep quality/sleep disorder, and dental occlusion. Demographic information, information on education level, profession, and socio-economic status were queried. Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare results. Results: Forty-two of the original 200 patients (20 Kriens IVV and 19 non-IVV) chose to participate. Average age at survey was 25±3 years. Analysis yielded no difference between the 2 respondent groups for need for secondary velopharyngeal management. There were no differences in speech outcome and satisfaction (8 questions, 0.30 < P<0.97), sleep concerns (3 questions, 0.16 < P<0.39), and dental occlusion (P=0.69). Equivalent proportions of the 2 groups had been in speech therapy (P=0.22). There was no difference in education attainment of the 2 groups (P=0.26). Conclusions: The original randomized prospective trial suggested that there was no difference between the 2 surgery types in need for secondary velopharyngeal management. This long-term survey study on the same group of patients suggests that in young adulthood, the 2 groups have similar outcomes in terms of education, career choice, speech satisfaction, dental occlusion, and sleep disorder.
KW - Cleft palate
KW - Kriens intravelar veloplasty
KW - cleft team
KW - non-IVV
KW - palatoplasty
KW - speech
KW - speech therapy
KW - velopharyngeal dysfunction
KW - velopharyngeal management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014627244&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003526
DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003526
M3 - Article
C2 - 28277486
AN - SCOPUS:85014627244
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 28
SP - 909
EP - 914
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 4
ER -