TY - JOUR
T1 - Adapting Collaborative Depression Care for Public Community Long-Term Care
T2 - Using Research–Practice Partnerships
AU - Hasche, Leslie K.
AU - Lenze, Shannon
AU - Brown, Teresa
AU - Lawrence, Lisa
AU - Nickel, Mike
AU - Morrow-Howell, Nancy
AU - Proctor, Enola K.
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge support from the National Institute of Mental Health’s pre-doctoral and post-doctoral trainee program (1T32MH19960) and grant support (R34 MH071632-01A2; 9/06–1/09) at the Center for Mental Health Services Research at the George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University. We also express appreciation for ongoing the support from the leaders and caseworkers at the partnering public CLTC agency.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2013, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - This manuscript details potential benefits for using a research–practice partnership to adapt collaborative depression care for public community long-term care agencies serving older adults. We used sequential, multi-phase, and mixed methods approaches for documenting the process of adaptation within a case study. Systematic adaptation strategies are described, such as leveraging long-term research–practice collaborations, consulting with multiple stakeholders across all levels and disciplines, and balancing demands to monitor treatment fidelity, clinical outcomes, and implementation results. These examples demonstrate that researchers interested in implementation science need skills to negotiate the competing demands that arise from both the research and practice settings.
AB - This manuscript details potential benefits for using a research–practice partnership to adapt collaborative depression care for public community long-term care agencies serving older adults. We used sequential, multi-phase, and mixed methods approaches for documenting the process of adaptation within a case study. Systematic adaptation strategies are described, such as leveraging long-term research–practice collaborations, consulting with multiple stakeholders across all levels and disciplines, and balancing demands to monitor treatment fidelity, clinical outcomes, and implementation results. These examples demonstrate that researchers interested in implementation science need skills to negotiate the competing demands that arise from both the research and practice settings.
KW - Collaborative care
KW - Depression
KW - Implementation
KW - Research–practice partnerships
KW - State agencies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919919905&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10488-013-0519-z
DO - 10.1007/s10488-013-0519-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 24072560
AN - SCOPUS:84919919905
SN - 0894-587X
VL - 41
SP - 687
EP - 696
JO - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
JF - Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
IS - 5
ER -