TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes and differential response to simvastatin
T2 - secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial
AU - Irish Critical Care Trials Group
AU - Calfee, Carolyn S.
AU - Delucchi, Kevin L.
AU - Sinha, Pratik
AU - Matthay, Michael A.
AU - Hackett, Jonathan
AU - Shankar-Hari, Manu
AU - McDowell, Cliona
AU - Laffey, John G.
AU - O'Kane, Cecilia M.
AU - McAuley, Daniel F.
AU - Johnston, Andrew J.
AU - Paikray, Archana
AU - Yates, Cat
AU - Polgarova, Petra
AU - Price, Esther
AU - McInerney, Amy
AU - Zamoscik, Katarzyna
AU - Dempsey, Ged
AU - Seasman, Colette
AU - Gilfeather, Lynn
AU - Hemmings, Noel
AU - O'Kane, Sinead
AU - Johnston, Paul
AU - Pokorny, Lukas
AU - Nutt, Chris
AU - O'Neill, Orla
AU - Prashast, Prashast
AU - Smalley, Chris
AU - Jacob, Reni
AU - O'Rourke, James
AU - Sultan, Syed Farjad
AU - Schilling, Carole
AU - Perkins, Gavin D.
AU - Melody, Teresa
AU - Couper, Keith
AU - Daniels, Ron
AU - Gao, Fang
AU - Hull, Julian
AU - Gould, Timothy
AU - Thomas, Matthew
AU - Sweet, Katie
AU - Breen, Dorothy
AU - Neau, Emer
AU - Peel, Willis J.
AU - Jardine, Catherine
AU - Jefferson, Paul
AU - Wright, Stephen E.
AU - Harris, Kayla
AU - Hierons, Sarah
AU - McInerney, Veronica
N1 - Funding Information:
CSC reports grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study, grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline and Bayer, and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche/Genentech, CSL Behring, and Prometic outside the submitted work. DFM reports grants from the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) Programme, Health Research Board Ireland, Northern Ireland Public Health Agency Research and Development, Intensive Care Society of Ireland, and REVIVE for the conduct of the study. DFM reports personal fees for consultancy for GlaxoSmithKline, Swedish Orphan Biovitrium, Peptinnovate, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer, all outside the submitted work. DFM's institution has received grants from the NIHR and others and GlaxoSmithKline for DFM undertaking bronchoscopy as part of a clinical trial outside the submitted work. DFM has a patent issued to his institution for a treatment for ARDS. CMO reports grants from NIHR EME and Health and Social Care Research and Development during the conduct of the study. CMO's spouse has received consultancy fees from GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Peptinnovate, and Swedish Orphan Biovitrium. MAM reports grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, the Department of Defense, the Food and Drug Association, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, and GlaxoSmithKline, and personal fees from CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cerus Therapeutics, Roche/Genentech, Quark Pharmaceuticals, and Thesan Pharmaceuticals, all outside the submitted work. JGL reports grants from Health Research Board Ireland during the conduct of the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Funding Information:
We thank all patients who participated in the trial and their legal representatives, all research nurses and pharmacists in the participating centres, and medical and nursing staff in participating centres who cared for patients and collected data. We also thank the staff of the Northern Ireland Clinical Trials Unit for their support in conducting the trial, the staff from the Health Research Board Galway Clinical Research Facility, Galway, Ireland, for help in conducting the study in Ireland, the staff of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC) for providing APACHE II data for study sites that participate in the ICNARC Case Mix Programme, the staff of the Northern Ireland Clinical Research Network and the NIHR Clinical Research Network for help with patient recruitment and data acquisition, and the UK Intensive Care Foundation. CSC received funding from National Institutes of Health (grant number HL140026). MS-H is supported by the NIHR Clinician Scientist Award (CS-2016-16-011). The views expressed in this Article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Medical Research Council (MRC), National Health Service, NIHR, or Department of Health. This study was supported by the UK EME Programme, an MRC and NIHR partnership (08/99/08 and 16/33/01). The EME Programme is funded by the MRC and NIHR, with contributions from the Chief Scientist Office in Scotland, the National Institute for Social Care and Health Research in Wales, and the Health and Social Care (HSC) Research and Development Division, Public Health Agency for Northern Ireland; by a Health Research Award (HRA_POR-2010-131) from the Health Research Board, Dublin; and by additional funding from the HSC Research and Development Division, Public Health Agency for Northern Ireland, the Intensive Care Society of Ireland, and REVIVE.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/9/1
Y1 - 2018/9/1
N2 - Background: Precision medicine approaches that target patients on the basis of disease subtype have transformed treatment approaches to cancer, asthma, and other heterogeneous syndromes. Two distinct subphenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been identified in three US-based clinical trials, and these subphenotypes respond differently to positive end-expiratory pressure and fluid management. We aimed to investigate whether these subphenotypes exist in non-US patient populations and respond differently to pharmacotherapies. Methods: HARP-2 was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of simvastatin (80 mg) versus placebo done in general intensive care units (ICUs) at 40 hospitals in the UK and Ireland within 48 h of onset of ARDS. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days, and secondary outcomes included non-pulmonary organ failure-free days and mortality. In a secondary analysis of HARP-2, we applied latent class analysis to baseline data without consideration of outcomes to identify subphenotypes, and we compared clinical outcomes across subphenotypes and treatment groups. Findings: 540 patients were recruited to HARP-2. One patient withdrew consent for the use of their data, so data from 539 patients were analysed. In our secondary analysis, a two-class (two subphenotype) model was an improvement over a one-class model (p<0·0001), with 353 (65%) patients in the hypoinflammatory subphenotype group and 186 (35%) in the hyperinflammatory subphenotype group. Additional classes did not improve model fit. Clinical and biological characteristics of the two subphenotypes were similar to previous studies. Patients with the hyperinflammatory subphenotype had fewer ventilator-free days (median 2 days [IQR 0–17] vs 18 [IQR 0–23]; p<0·0001), fewer non-pulmonary organ failure-free days (15 [0–25] vs 27 [21–28]; p<0·0001), and higher 28-day mortality (73 [39%] vs 59 [17%]; p<0·0001) than did those with the hypoinflammatory subphenotype. Although HARP-2 found no difference in 28-day survival between placebo and simvastatin, significantly different survival was identified across patients stratified by treatment and subphenotype (p<0·0001). Specifically, within the hyperinflammatory subphenotype, patients treated with simvastatin had significantly higher 28-day survival than did those given placebo (p=0·008). A similar pattern was observed for 90-day survival. Interpretation: Two subphenotypes of ARDS were identified in the HARP-2 cohort, with distinct clinical and biological features and disparate clinical outcomes. The hyperinflammatory subphenotype had improved survival with simvastatin compared with placebo. These findings support further pursuit of predictive enrichment strategies in critical care clinical trials. Funding: UK Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme and National Institutes of Health.
AB - Background: Precision medicine approaches that target patients on the basis of disease subtype have transformed treatment approaches to cancer, asthma, and other heterogeneous syndromes. Two distinct subphenotypes of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been identified in three US-based clinical trials, and these subphenotypes respond differently to positive end-expiratory pressure and fluid management. We aimed to investigate whether these subphenotypes exist in non-US patient populations and respond differently to pharmacotherapies. Methods: HARP-2 was a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of simvastatin (80 mg) versus placebo done in general intensive care units (ICUs) at 40 hospitals in the UK and Ireland within 48 h of onset of ARDS. The primary outcome was ventilator-free days, and secondary outcomes included non-pulmonary organ failure-free days and mortality. In a secondary analysis of HARP-2, we applied latent class analysis to baseline data without consideration of outcomes to identify subphenotypes, and we compared clinical outcomes across subphenotypes and treatment groups. Findings: 540 patients were recruited to HARP-2. One patient withdrew consent for the use of their data, so data from 539 patients were analysed. In our secondary analysis, a two-class (two subphenotype) model was an improvement over a one-class model (p<0·0001), with 353 (65%) patients in the hypoinflammatory subphenotype group and 186 (35%) in the hyperinflammatory subphenotype group. Additional classes did not improve model fit. Clinical and biological characteristics of the two subphenotypes were similar to previous studies. Patients with the hyperinflammatory subphenotype had fewer ventilator-free days (median 2 days [IQR 0–17] vs 18 [IQR 0–23]; p<0·0001), fewer non-pulmonary organ failure-free days (15 [0–25] vs 27 [21–28]; p<0·0001), and higher 28-day mortality (73 [39%] vs 59 [17%]; p<0·0001) than did those with the hypoinflammatory subphenotype. Although HARP-2 found no difference in 28-day survival between placebo and simvastatin, significantly different survival was identified across patients stratified by treatment and subphenotype (p<0·0001). Specifically, within the hyperinflammatory subphenotype, patients treated with simvastatin had significantly higher 28-day survival than did those given placebo (p=0·008). A similar pattern was observed for 90-day survival. Interpretation: Two subphenotypes of ARDS were identified in the HARP-2 cohort, with distinct clinical and biological features and disparate clinical outcomes. The hyperinflammatory subphenotype had improved survival with simvastatin compared with placebo. These findings support further pursuit of predictive enrichment strategies in critical care clinical trials. Funding: UK Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme and National Institutes of Health.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054558680&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30177-2
DO - 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30177-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 30078618
AN - SCOPUS:85054558680
SN - 2213-2600
VL - 6
SP - 691
EP - 698
JO - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
JF - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
IS - 9
ER -