TY - JOUR
T1 - Acute hemodynamic responses to sublingual nifedipine
T2 - Dependence on left ventricular function
AU - Ludbrook, P. A.
AU - Tiefenbrunn, A. J.
AU - Reed, F. R.
AU - Sobel, B. E.
PY - 1982
Y1 - 1982
N2 - To characterize the acute effects of nifedipine on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function, we studied 32 patients stratified with respect to baseline LV function before and 30 minutes after nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) with a randomized, single-blind protocol. Nineteen patients received nifedipine and 13 received placebo. No change occurred in any variable after placebo. Nifedipine lowered left ventricular afterload, reflected by significant decreases in systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures of 13%, 10% and 17%, respectively. LV systolic pressure fell by 13%, ejection fraction, mean Vcf, mean normalized systolic ejection rate (MNSER), and the end-systolic pressure/volume (P-V) ratio increased by 14%, 41%, 25% and 19%, respectively, and cardiac index rose by 16% (p < 0.05 for each). Overall, diastolic LV function did not change; diastolic pressures, early diastolic relaxation, diastolic exponential P-V and P-V elasticity relations and end-diastolic stiffness remained constant. However, among patients stratified according to baseline LV function (group 1: end-diastolic volume ≤ 90 ml/m2, end-diastolic pressure ≤ 20 mm Hg; group 2: end-diastolic volume > 90 ml/m2, end-diastolic pressure > 20 mm Hg) striking differences were evident. In group 2 patients, nifedipine decreased LV systolic and end-diastolic pressures, while LV end-diastolic and systolic volumes, and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance all declined significantly, by 13%, 27%, 41% and 52%, respectively. Enhancement of ejection fraction (34%), Vcf (46%) and MNSER (41%) in group 2 patients was substantially more prominent than that in patients with normal baseline LV function (9%, 35% and 15%, respectively). Relaxation and diastolic stiffness properties were insignificantly changed in both groups, but the diastolic exponential P-V relation was displaced downward by nifedipine in patients with impaired baseline ventricular function, and cardiac output was increased by 25%, compared with a negligible change (3%) in group 1 patients. These results show that nifedipine has significant, clinically favorable effects due predominantly to reduction of LV afterload in patients with impaired baseline LV function. Nifedipine reduced myocardial oxygen requirements, enhanced diastolic performance and consequently improved systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, LV ejection function and cardiac output.
AB - To characterize the acute effects of nifedipine on left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function, we studied 32 patients stratified with respect to baseline LV function before and 30 minutes after nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) with a randomized, single-blind protocol. Nineteen patients received nifedipine and 13 received placebo. No change occurred in any variable after placebo. Nifedipine lowered left ventricular afterload, reflected by significant decreases in systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures of 13%, 10% and 17%, respectively. LV systolic pressure fell by 13%, ejection fraction, mean Vcf, mean normalized systolic ejection rate (MNSER), and the end-systolic pressure/volume (P-V) ratio increased by 14%, 41%, 25% and 19%, respectively, and cardiac index rose by 16% (p < 0.05 for each). Overall, diastolic LV function did not change; diastolic pressures, early diastolic relaxation, diastolic exponential P-V and P-V elasticity relations and end-diastolic stiffness remained constant. However, among patients stratified according to baseline LV function (group 1: end-diastolic volume ≤ 90 ml/m2, end-diastolic pressure ≤ 20 mm Hg; group 2: end-diastolic volume > 90 ml/m2, end-diastolic pressure > 20 mm Hg) striking differences were evident. In group 2 patients, nifedipine decreased LV systolic and end-diastolic pressures, while LV end-diastolic and systolic volumes, and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance all declined significantly, by 13%, 27%, 41% and 52%, respectively. Enhancement of ejection fraction (34%), Vcf (46%) and MNSER (41%) in group 2 patients was substantially more prominent than that in patients with normal baseline LV function (9%, 35% and 15%, respectively). Relaxation and diastolic stiffness properties were insignificantly changed in both groups, but the diastolic exponential P-V relation was displaced downward by nifedipine in patients with impaired baseline ventricular function, and cardiac output was increased by 25%, compared with a negligible change (3%) in group 1 patients. These results show that nifedipine has significant, clinically favorable effects due predominantly to reduction of LV afterload in patients with impaired baseline LV function. Nifedipine reduced myocardial oxygen requirements, enhanced diastolic performance and consequently improved systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, LV ejection function and cardiac output.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020078660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/01.CIR.65.3.489
DO - 10.1161/01.CIR.65.3.489
M3 - Article
C2 - 7055871
AN - SCOPUS:0020078660
VL - 65
SP - 489
EP - 498
JO - Circulation
JF - Circulation
SN - 0009-7322
IS - 3
ER -