TY - JOUR
T1 - Activity tolerance after Periacetabular osteotomy
AU - Bogunovic, Ljiljana
AU - Hunt, Devyani
AU - Prather, Heidi
AU - Schoenecker, Perry L.
AU - Clohisy, John C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The Author.
PY - 2014/8/1
Y1 - 2014/8/1
N2 - Background: Periacetabular osteotomy is a well-described surgical intervention for symptomatic acetabular deformities in skeletally mature patients. Data regarding return to athletic activity or sport after this procedure are still limited.Purpose: To evaluate the ability of patients to return to preoperative levels of activity after periacetabular osteotomy.Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods: This is a retrospective review of active patients treated with periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular deformity correction. Patients were identified as those with preoperative University of California-Los Angeles activity levels ≥7. Patient demographics, operative data, radiographic measures, and clinical outcomes were documented prospectively. The University of California-Los Angeles activity score, Harris Hip Score, Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were used to measure clinical outcomes, and details regarding activity and satisfaction were analyzed.Results: This study included 36 patients (39 hips; 15 males and 21 females) whose average age was 25 years (range, 15-45 years) and whose average body mass index was 24±3.5 kg/m2. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range, 18-59 months). Preoperatively, the average lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, and acetabular index were 10°, 14 deg;, and 21deg;, respectively; 92%of patients had a To nnis osteoarthritis grade of 0 or 1. One patient failed hip preservation surgery and went on to total hip arthroplasty 27 months after periacetabular osteotomy. Of the remaining patients, 71% reported an increase or no change in activity level postoperatively. The University of California-Los Angeles score was also unchanged (9.2 vs 8.8, P=.157), and the Harris Hip Score (63 vs 87, P<001), Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life (38 vs 71, P<001), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (71 vs 92, P<001) results improved from preoperative levels. There was a 97% rate of satisfaction with the surgery. Four patients (11%) reported hip pain as the primary factor limiting postoperative activity.Conclusion: The majority (71%) of active patients with hip dysplasia return to presurgical or higher activity levels after open hip preservation surgery with the periacetabular osteotomy.
AB - Background: Periacetabular osteotomy is a well-described surgical intervention for symptomatic acetabular deformities in skeletally mature patients. Data regarding return to athletic activity or sport after this procedure are still limited.Purpose: To evaluate the ability of patients to return to preoperative levels of activity after periacetabular osteotomy.Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods: This is a retrospective review of active patients treated with periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular deformity correction. Patients were identified as those with preoperative University of California-Los Angeles activity levels ≥7. Patient demographics, operative data, radiographic measures, and clinical outcomes were documented prospectively. The University of California-Los Angeles activity score, Harris Hip Score, Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were used to measure clinical outcomes, and details regarding activity and satisfaction were analyzed.Results: This study included 36 patients (39 hips; 15 males and 21 females) whose average age was 25 years (range, 15-45 years) and whose average body mass index was 24±3.5 kg/m2. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range, 18-59 months). Preoperatively, the average lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, and acetabular index were 10°, 14 deg;, and 21deg;, respectively; 92%of patients had a To nnis osteoarthritis grade of 0 or 1. One patient failed hip preservation surgery and went on to total hip arthroplasty 27 months after periacetabular osteotomy. Of the remaining patients, 71% reported an increase or no change in activity level postoperatively. The University of California-Los Angeles score was also unchanged (9.2 vs 8.8, P=.157), and the Harris Hip Score (63 vs 87, P<001), Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Quality of Life (38 vs 71, P<001), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (71 vs 92, P<001) results improved from preoperative levels. There was a 97% rate of satisfaction with the surgery. Four patients (11%) reported hip pain as the primary factor limiting postoperative activity.Conclusion: The majority (71%) of active patients with hip dysplasia return to presurgical or higher activity levels after open hip preservation surgery with the periacetabular osteotomy.
KW - acetabular dysplasia
KW - hip dysplasia
KW - periacetabular osteotomy
KW - surgical hip dislocation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907218607&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0363546514535906
DO - 10.1177/0363546514535906
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24914031
AN - SCOPUS:84907218607
SN - 0363-5465
VL - 42
SP - 1791
EP - 1795
JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 8
ER -