TY - JOUR
T1 - ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Soft-Tissue Masses
AU - Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging:
AU - Kransdorf, Mark J.
AU - Murphey, Mark D.
AU - Wessell, Daniel E.
AU - Cassidy, R. Carter
AU - Czuczman, Gregory J.
AU - Demertzis, Jennifer L.
AU - Lenchik, Leon
AU - Motamedi, Kambiz
AU - Pierce, Jennifer L.
AU - Sharma, Akash
AU - Walker, Eric A.
AU - Ying-Kou Yung, Elizabeth
AU - Beaman, Francesca D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American College of Radiology
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Imaging is an integral component of the evaluation of patients with a suspected soft-tissue mass. Imaging can not only confirm the presence of a mass but can provide essential information necessary for diagnosis, local staging, and biopsy planning. Although the objectives of the evaluation have not changed, the choices available for imaging of musculoskeletal masses have evolved dramatically in recent years. The purpose of this document is to identify the most common clinical scenarios and the most appropriate imaging for their assessment on the basis of the current literature and to provide general guidance for those scenarios that are not specifically addressed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
AB - Imaging is an integral component of the evaluation of patients with a suspected soft-tissue mass. Imaging can not only confirm the presence of a mass but can provide essential information necessary for diagnosis, local staging, and biopsy planning. Although the objectives of the evaluation have not changed, the choices available for imaging of musculoskeletal masses have evolved dramatically in recent years. The purpose of this document is to identify the most common clinical scenarios and the most appropriate imaging for their assessment on the basis of the current literature and to provide general guidance for those scenarios that are not specifically addressed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
KW - AUC
KW - Appropriate Use Criteria
KW - Appropriateness Criteria
KW - Imaging
KW - Mass
KW - Neoplasm
KW - Soft tissue
KW - Tumor
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046970713&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 29724421
AN - SCOPUS:85046970713
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 15
SP - S189-S197
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 5
ER -