Acquired ductopenia: an insight into imaging findings

Rachita Khot, Nathan R. Shelman, Daniel R. Ludwig, Rashmi T. Nair, Mark A. Anderson, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh, Raj Mohan Paspulati, Rex A. Parker, Christine O. Menias

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hepatic ductopenia is a pathologic diagnosis characterized by a decrease in the number of intrahepatic bile ducts as a consequence of various underlying etiologies. Some etiologies, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, primary biliary cholangitis, and ischemic cholangitis, often have distinctive imaging findings. In contrast, other causes such as chronic rejection following liver transplantation, drug-induced biliary injury, infection, malignancy such as lymphoma, and graft-versus-host disease may only have ancillary or non-specific imaging findings. Thus, diagnosing ductopenia in conditions with nonspecific imaging findings requires a multidimensional approach, including clinical evaluation, serological testing, imaging, and liver histology to identify the underlying cause. These etiologies lead to impaired bile flow, resulting in cholestasis, liver dysfunction, and, ultimately, cirrhosis and liver failure if the underlying cause remains untreated or undetected. In the majority of instances, individuals diagnosed with ductopenia exhibit a positive response to treatment addressing the root cause or cessation of the causative agent. This article focuses on acquired causes of ductopenia, its clinical manifestation, histopathology, imaging diagnosis, and management.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0120110
Pages (from-to)152-168
Number of pages17
JournalAbdominal Radiology
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2025

Keywords

  • Autoimmune diseases
  • Drug-induced injury
  • Ductopenia
  • Graft-versus-host disease
  • Ischemic cholangitis
  • Vanishing bile duct syndrome

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Acquired ductopenia: an insight into imaging findings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this