Accuracy of bedside electroencephalographic monitoring in comparison with simultaneous continuous conventional electroencephalography for seizure detection in term infants

  • Divyen K. Shah
  • , Mark T. Mackay
  • , Shelly Lavery
  • , Susan Watson
  • , A. Simon Harvey
  • , John Zempel
  • , Amit Mathur
  • , Terrie E. Inder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

194 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Our goals were to compare (1) single-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography alone, (2) 2-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography alone, and (3) amplitude-integrated electroencephalography plus 2-channel electro- encephalography with simultaneous continuous conventional electroencephalogra- phy for seizure detection in term infants to check the accuracy of limited channels and compare the different modalities of bedside electroencephalography monitoring. METHODS. Infants referred to a tertiary center with clinical seizures underwent simultaneous continuous conventional electroencephalography and 2-channel (C3-P3 and C4-P4) bedside monitoring. Off-line analysis of the continuous conventional electroencephalographic results was performed independently by 2 neurologists. Two experienced neonatal readers reviewed results obtained with amplitude-integrated electroencephalography and 2-channel electroencephalography combined and single-channel and 2-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. All readings were performed independently and then compared. RESULTS. Twenty-one term newborns were monitored. Seizures were detected in 7 patients who had up to 12 electrical seizures, with 1 infant in status epilepticus. Seizures were identified correctly in 6 of 7 patients with amplitude-integrated electroencephalography plus 2-channel electroencephalography. The missed infant had an isolated 12-second seizure. With amplitude-integrated electroencephalography plus 2-channel electroencephalography, 31 of 41 non-status epilepticus seizures were correctly identified (sensitivity, 76%;specificity, 78%;positive predictive value, 78%;negative predictive value, 78%), with a substantial level of interrater agreement. The seizures missed were predominantly slow sharp waves of occipital origin from a single patient (7 of 10 seizures). Nine false-positive results were obtained in 351 hours of recording (1 false-positive result per 39 hours). These were thought to be related to muscle, electrode, and patting artifacts. Use of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography alone (1 or 2 channel) provided low sensitivity (27%-56%) and low interob- server agreement. CONCLUSIONS. Limited-channel bedside electroencephalography combining amplitude-integrated electroencephalography with 2-channel electroencephalography, interpreted by experienced neonatal readers, detected the majority of electrical seizures in at-risk newborn infants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1146-1154
Number of pages9
JournalPediatrics
Volume121
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Keywords

  • Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography
  • Neonate
  • Seizure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of bedside electroencephalographic monitoring in comparison with simultaneous continuous conventional electroencephalography for seizure detection in term infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this