TY - JOUR
T1 - Acceptability of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Tinnitus
T2 - A Study With Veterans and Nonveterans
AU - Rodriguez, Chavez R.
AU - Piccirillo, Jay F.
AU - Rodebaugh, Thomas L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Purpose: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a gold standard yet underuti-lized treatment for tinnitus, and tinnitus is especially highly prevalent among veterans. The aims of this study were twofold: to determine (a) if CBT for tinnitus is underutilized because participants find it less acceptable than other behavioral treatments for tinnitus and (b) if veterans and nonveterans rate behavioral treatments for tinnitus differently. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted online with a sample of 277 adults in the United States who self-reported at least some level of bothersome tinnitus in the past week. The sample for this study consisted of 129 veterans and 148 nonveterans. Participants read descriptions of CBT, tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT), and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). For each treatment, presented to them in random order, they provided credibility, expectancy, and acceptability ratings. Results: Among 277 participants, 147 (53.07%) reporting gender were women, 216 (77.98%) reporting race/ethnicity were White, and 129 (46.57%) were veterans of any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces. Veteran ratings of credibility, expectancy, and acceptability were significantly lower than nonveteran ratings across treatments. There were differences in credibility, expectancy, and acceptability ratings across treatments, and post hoc testing revealed that TRT was consistently rated higher than CBT or MBSR. Conclusions: Despite strong research support, CBT was rated as less acceptable than a different, less widely empirically supported treatment. Veterans’ ratings of acceptability were lower than those of nonveterans across all treatments.
AB - Purpose: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a gold standard yet underuti-lized treatment for tinnitus, and tinnitus is especially highly prevalent among veterans. The aims of this study were twofold: to determine (a) if CBT for tinnitus is underutilized because participants find it less acceptable than other behavioral treatments for tinnitus and (b) if veterans and nonveterans rate behavioral treatments for tinnitus differently. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted online with a sample of 277 adults in the United States who self-reported at least some level of bothersome tinnitus in the past week. The sample for this study consisted of 129 veterans and 148 nonveterans. Participants read descriptions of CBT, tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT), and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). For each treatment, presented to them in random order, they provided credibility, expectancy, and acceptability ratings. Results: Among 277 participants, 147 (53.07%) reporting gender were women, 216 (77.98%) reporting race/ethnicity were White, and 129 (46.57%) were veterans of any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces. Veteran ratings of credibility, expectancy, and acceptability were significantly lower than nonveteran ratings across treatments. There were differences in credibility, expectancy, and acceptability ratings across treatments, and post hoc testing revealed that TRT was consistently rated higher than CBT or MBSR. Conclusions: Despite strong research support, CBT was rated as less acceptable than a different, less widely empirically supported treatment. Veterans’ ratings of acceptability were lower than those of nonveterans across all treatments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169847175&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00020
DO - 10.1044/2023_AJA-23-00020
M3 - Article
C2 - 37566882
AN - SCOPUS:85169847175
SN - 1059-0889
VL - 32
SP - 593
EP - 603
JO - American Journal of Audiology
JF - American Journal of Audiology
IS - 3
ER -