TY - JOUR
T1 - Accelerating Prediction of Malignant Cerebral Edema After Ischemic Stroke with Automated Image Analysis and Explainable Neural Networks
AU - Foroushani, Hossein Mohammadian
AU - Hamzehloo, Ali
AU - Kumar, Atul
AU - Chen, Yasheng
AU - Heitsch, Laura
AU - Slowik, Agnieszka
AU - Strbian, Daniel
AU - Lee, Jin Moo
AU - Marcus, Daniel S.
AU - Dhar, Rajat
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and Neurocritical Care Society.
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background: Malignant cerebral edema is a devastating complication of stroke, resulting in deterioration and death if hemicraniectomy is not performed prior to herniation. Current approaches for predicting this relatively rare complication often require advanced imaging and still suffer from suboptimal performance. We performed a pilot study to evaluate whether neural networks incorporating data extracted from routine computed tomography (CT) imaging could enhance prediction of edema in a large diverse stroke cohort. Methods: An automated imaging pipeline retrospectively extracted volumetric data, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes and the hemispheric CSF volume ratio, from baseline and 24 h CT scans performed in participants of an international stroke cohort study. Fully connected and long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks were trained using serial clinical and imaging data to predict those who would require hemicraniectomy or die with midline shift. The performance of these models was tested, in comparison with regression models and the Enhanced Detection of Edema in Malignant Anterior Circulation Stroke (EDEMA) score, using cross-validation to construct precision-recall curves. Results: Twenty of 598 patients developed malignant edema (12 required surgery, 8 died). The regression model provided 95% recall but only 32% precision (area under the precision-recall curve [AUPRC] 0.74), similar to the EDEMA score (precision 28%, AUPRC 0.66). The fully connected network did not perform better (precision 33%, AUPRC 0.71), but the LSTM model provided 100% recall and 87% precision (AUPRC 0.97) in the overall cohort and the subgroup with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8 (p = 0.0001 vs. regression and fully connected models). Features providing the most predictive importance were the hemispheric CSF ratio and NIHSS score measured at 24 h. Conclusions: An LSTM neural network incorporating volumetric data extracted from routine CT scans identified all cases of malignant cerebral edema by 24 h after stroke, with significantly fewer false positives than a fully connected neural network, regression model, and the validated EDEMA score. This preliminary work requires prospective validation but provides proof of principle that a deep learning framework could assist in selecting patients for surgery prior to deterioration.
AB - Background: Malignant cerebral edema is a devastating complication of stroke, resulting in deterioration and death if hemicraniectomy is not performed prior to herniation. Current approaches for predicting this relatively rare complication often require advanced imaging and still suffer from suboptimal performance. We performed a pilot study to evaluate whether neural networks incorporating data extracted from routine computed tomography (CT) imaging could enhance prediction of edema in a large diverse stroke cohort. Methods: An automated imaging pipeline retrospectively extracted volumetric data, including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes and the hemispheric CSF volume ratio, from baseline and 24 h CT scans performed in participants of an international stroke cohort study. Fully connected and long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks were trained using serial clinical and imaging data to predict those who would require hemicraniectomy or die with midline shift. The performance of these models was tested, in comparison with regression models and the Enhanced Detection of Edema in Malignant Anterior Circulation Stroke (EDEMA) score, using cross-validation to construct precision-recall curves. Results: Twenty of 598 patients developed malignant edema (12 required surgery, 8 died). The regression model provided 95% recall but only 32% precision (area under the precision-recall curve [AUPRC] 0.74), similar to the EDEMA score (precision 28%, AUPRC 0.66). The fully connected network did not perform better (precision 33%, AUPRC 0.71), but the LSTM model provided 100% recall and 87% precision (AUPRC 0.97) in the overall cohort and the subgroup with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 8 (p = 0.0001 vs. regression and fully connected models). Features providing the most predictive importance were the hemispheric CSF ratio and NIHSS score measured at 24 h. Conclusions: An LSTM neural network incorporating volumetric data extracted from routine CT scans identified all cases of malignant cerebral edema by 24 h after stroke, with significantly fewer false positives than a fully connected neural network, regression model, and the validated EDEMA score. This preliminary work requires prospective validation but provides proof of principle that a deep learning framework could assist in selecting patients for surgery prior to deterioration.
KW - Brain computed tomography scan
KW - Brain edema
KW - Cerebral infarction
KW - Deep learning
KW - Early diagnosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85112801435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12028-021-01325-x
DO - 10.1007/s12028-021-01325-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 34417703
AN - SCOPUS:85112801435
SN - 1541-6933
VL - 36
SP - 471
EP - 482
JO - Neurocritical Care
JF - Neurocritical Care
IS - 2
ER -