About hysteresis in Shaker: Response to note by Villalba-Galea

Baron Chanda; John Cowgill

doi:10.1085/jgp.202313381

About hysteresis in Shaker: Response to note by Villalba-Galea

Baron Chanda
, John Cowgill

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Abstract

In this issue, Villalba-Galea (2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202313371) expresses interest in our recently published work (Cowgill and Chanda. 2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202112883). Our response points out the deficiencies in the alternative explanation proposed by Villalba-Galea to account for our findings on hysteresis (or lack thereof) in steady state charge–voltage curves of Shaker potassium channel.

Original language	English
Article number	e202313381
Journal	Journal of General Physiology
Volume	155
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202313381
State	Published - May 2023

Access to Document

10.1085/jgp.202313381

Cite this

@article{cc8628ec1d33463e8a0ea9d30bbab7af,

title = "About hysteresis in Shaker: Response to note by Villalba-Galea",

abstract = "In this issue, Villalba-Galea (2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202313371) expresses interest in our recently published work (Cowgill and Chanda. 2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202112883). Our response points out the deficiencies in the alternative explanation proposed by Villalba-Galea to account for our findings on hysteresis (or lack thereof) in steady state charge–voltage curves of Shaker potassium channel.",

author = "Baron Chanda and John Cowgill",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 Chanda and Cowgill.",

year = "2023",

month = may,

doi = "10.1085/jgp.202313381",

language = "English",

volume = "155",

journal = "Journal of General Physiology",

issn = "0022-1295",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - About hysteresis in Shaker

T2 - Response to note by Villalba-Galea

AU - Chanda, Baron

AU - Cowgill, John

PY - 2023/5

Y1 - 2023/5

N2 - In this issue, Villalba-Galea (2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202313371) expresses interest in our recently published work (Cowgill and Chanda. 2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202112883). Our response points out the deficiencies in the alternative explanation proposed by Villalba-Galea to account for our findings on hysteresis (or lack thereof) in steady state charge–voltage curves of Shaker potassium channel.

AB - In this issue, Villalba-Galea (2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202313371) expresses interest in our recently published work (Cowgill and Chanda. 2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202112883). Our response points out the deficiencies in the alternative explanation proposed by Villalba-Galea to account for our findings on hysteresis (or lack thereof) in steady state charge–voltage curves of Shaker potassium channel.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85151573973

U2 - 10.1085/jgp.202313381

DO - 10.1085/jgp.202313381

M3 - Letter

C2 - 36995319

AN - SCOPUS:85151573973

SN - 0022-1295

VL - 155

JO - Journal of General Physiology

JF - Journal of General Physiology

IS - 5

M1 - e202313381

ER -

About hysteresis in Shaker: Response to note by Villalba-Galea

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this