Abstract

In this issue, Villalba-Galea (2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202313371) expresses interest in our recently published work (Cowgill and Chanda. 2023. J. Gen. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202112883). Our response points out the deficiencies in the alternative explanation proposed by Villalba-Galea to account for our findings on hysteresis (or lack thereof) in steady state charge–voltage curves of Shaker potassium channel.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere202313381
JournalJournal of General Physiology
Volume155
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'About hysteresis in Shaker: Response to note by Villalba-Galea'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this