TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of structural neuroimaging markers of psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder
AU - Moreau, Allison L.
AU - Hansen, Isabella
AU - Bogdan, Ryan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2025 Moreau, Hansen and Bogdan.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Identifying individual difference factors associated with treatment response and putative mechanisms of therapeutic change may improve treatment for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Our systematic review of structural neuroimaging markers (i.e., morphometry, structural connectivity) of psychotherapy and medication treatment response for OCD identified 26 eligible publications from 20 studies (average study total n=54 ± 41.6 [range: 11-175]; OCD group n=29 ± 19) in child, adolescent, and adult samples evaluating baseline brain structure correlates of treatment response as well as treatment-related changes in brain structure. Findings were inconsistent across studies; significant associations within the anterior cingulate cortex (3/5 regional, 2/8 whole brain studies) and orbitofrontal cortex (5/10 regional, 2/7 whole brain studies) were most common, but laterality and directionality were not always consistent. Structural neuroimaging markers of treatment response do not currently hold clinical utility. Given increasing evidence that associations between complex behavior and brain structure are characterized by small, but potentially meaningful, effects, much larger samples are likely needed. Multivariate approaches (e.g., machine learning) may also improve the clinical predictive utility of neuroimaging data.
AB - Identifying individual difference factors associated with treatment response and putative mechanisms of therapeutic change may improve treatment for Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Our systematic review of structural neuroimaging markers (i.e., morphometry, structural connectivity) of psychotherapy and medication treatment response for OCD identified 26 eligible publications from 20 studies (average study total n=54 ± 41.6 [range: 11-175]; OCD group n=29 ± 19) in child, adolescent, and adult samples evaluating baseline brain structure correlates of treatment response as well as treatment-related changes in brain structure. Findings were inconsistent across studies; significant associations within the anterior cingulate cortex (3/5 regional, 2/8 whole brain studies) and orbitofrontal cortex (5/10 regional, 2/7 whole brain studies) were most common, but laterality and directionality were not always consistent. Structural neuroimaging markers of treatment response do not currently hold clinical utility. Given increasing evidence that associations between complex behavior and brain structure are characterized by small, but potentially meaningful, effects, much larger samples are likely needed. Multivariate approaches (e.g., machine learning) may also improve the clinical predictive utility of neuroimaging data.
KW - neuromarkers
KW - obsessive-compulsive disorder
KW - pharmacotherapy
KW - psychotherapy
KW - structural magnetic resonance imaging
KW - treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85219131894
U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1432253
DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1432253
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40018086
AN - SCOPUS:85219131894
SN - 1664-0640
VL - 15
JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry
JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry
M1 - 1432253
ER -