TY - JOUR
T1 - A survey of attitudes toward clinical trials and genetic disclosure in autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease
AU - Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network
AU - Grill, Joshua D.
AU - Bateman, Randall J.
AU - Buckles, Virginia
AU - Oliver, Angela
AU - Morris, John C.
AU - Masters, Colin L.
AU - Klunk, William E.
AU - Ringman, John M.
N1 - Funding Information:
JDG has been a trial investigator for ADCS, Eli Lilly, Merck, Biogen Idec, Janssen Alzheimer’s Immunotherapy, Genentech, and Avanir. RJB reports grants from the Alzheimer’s Association, American Academy of Neurology, Anonymous Foundation, AstraZeneca, BrightFocus Foundation, Cure Alzheimer’s Fund, Glenn Foundation for Medical Research, Merck, Metropolitan Life Foundation, NIH, Pharma Consortium (Biogen Idec, Elan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Eli Lilly and Co., Hoffman La-Roche Inc., Genentech Inc., Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy, Mithridion Inc., Novartis Pharma AG, Pfizer Biotherapeutics R and D, Sanofi-Aventi, Eisai), Roche, and Ruth K. Broadman Biomedical Research Foundation; nonfinancial support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals; other from C2N Diagnostics, NIH/state government sources; personal fees and other from Washington University; personal fees and nonfinancial support from Roche, IMI, Sanofi, Global Alzheimer’s Platform, FORUM, OECD, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and personal fees from Merck. All are outside the submitted work. AO, RJB, VB, JMR, and WEK have no competing interests. CLM has provided consultation to Eli Lilly and Company and Prana Biotechnology. JCM has participated in or is currently participating in clinical trials of antidementia drugs sponsored by the following companies: Janssen Immunotherapy, Pfizer, Eli Lilly/Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, SNIFF (The Study of Nasal Insulin to Fight Forgetfullness) study, and A4 (The Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease) trial; has served as a consultant for Lilly USA, ISIS Pharmaceuticals, and Charles Dana Foundation; and receives research support from Eli Lilly/ Avid Radiopharmaceuticals and NIH.
Funding Information:
The authors thank the DIAN participants and their families and the faculty and staff at each of the DIAN sites for their contributions to the study. The DIAN is supported by NIA grant U19 AG032438 to JCM, and by an anonymous foundation. The DIAN-TU (RJB, principal investigator) is supported by the Alzheimer’s Association, NIH U01AG042791, U01AG042791-S1, R01AG046179, GHR Foundation, an anonymous foundation, and the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (members include Amgen, Biogen, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Forum, Genentech, Hoffman La-Roche, Janssen AIP, Mithridion, Novartis Pharm AG, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis). JDG and JMR were supported by NIA AG016570 and the Sidell-Kagan Foundation. JDG was supported by the P. Gene and Elaine Smoth Term Chair in Alzheimer’s Disease Research. JDG is currently supported by NIA AG016573. The DIAN study, including the survey discussed in this manuscript, was approved by the following ethical bodies: Butler Hospital Institutional Review Board; Hollywood Private Hospital Research Ethics Committee; Indiana University Institutional Review Board; Massachusetts General Hospital Institutional Review Board; Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee; National Research Ethics Service Committee of South Central Berkshire; New York State Psychiatric Institute—Columbia University Department of Psychiatry Institutional Review Board; UCLA Institutional Review Board; University New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee; University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board; and Washington University Institutional Review Board.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Grill et al.
PY - 2015/7/22
Y1 - 2015/7/22
N2 - Introduction: Because of its genetic underpinnings and consistent age of onset within families, autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) provides a unique opportunity to conduct clinical trials of investigational agents as preventative or symptom-delaying treatments. The design of such trials may be complicated by low rates of genetic testing and disclosure among persons at risk of inheriting disease-causing mutations. Methods: To better understand the attitudes toward genetic testing and clinical trials of persons at risk for ADAD, we surveyed participants in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN), a multisite longitudinal study of clinical and biomarker outcomes in ADAD that does not require learning genetic status to participate. Results: Eighty participants completed a brief anonymous survey by mail or on-line; 40 % reported knowing if they carried a gene mutation, 15 % did not know but expressed a desire to learn their genetic status, and 45 % did not know and did not desire to know their genetic status. Among participants who knew or wished to know their genetic status, 86 % were interested in participating in a clinical trial. Seventy-two percent of participants who did not wish to learn their genetic status reported that they would change their mind, if learning that they carried a mutation gave them the opportunity to participate in a clinical trial. Nearly all participants responded that they would be interested if an open-label extension were offered. Conclusions: These results suggest that the availability of clinical trials to prevent ADAD can affect persons' desire to undergo genetic testing and that consideration can be given to performing studies in which such testing is required.
AB - Introduction: Because of its genetic underpinnings and consistent age of onset within families, autosomal dominant Alzheimer's disease (ADAD) provides a unique opportunity to conduct clinical trials of investigational agents as preventative or symptom-delaying treatments. The design of such trials may be complicated by low rates of genetic testing and disclosure among persons at risk of inheriting disease-causing mutations. Methods: To better understand the attitudes toward genetic testing and clinical trials of persons at risk for ADAD, we surveyed participants in the Dominantly Inherited Alzheimer's Network (DIAN), a multisite longitudinal study of clinical and biomarker outcomes in ADAD that does not require learning genetic status to participate. Results: Eighty participants completed a brief anonymous survey by mail or on-line; 40 % reported knowing if they carried a gene mutation, 15 % did not know but expressed a desire to learn their genetic status, and 45 % did not know and did not desire to know their genetic status. Among participants who knew or wished to know their genetic status, 86 % were interested in participating in a clinical trial. Seventy-two percent of participants who did not wish to learn their genetic status reported that they would change their mind, if learning that they carried a mutation gave them the opportunity to participate in a clinical trial. Nearly all participants responded that they would be interested if an open-label extension were offered. Conclusions: These results suggest that the availability of clinical trials to prevent ADAD can affect persons' desire to undergo genetic testing and that consideration can be given to performing studies in which such testing is required.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937552248&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s13195-015-0135-0
DO - 10.1186/s13195-015-0135-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 26203303
AN - SCOPUS:84937552248
SN - 1758-9193
VL - 7
JO - Alzheimer's Research and Therapy
JF - Alzheimer's Research and Therapy
IS - 1
M1 - 50
ER -