TY - JOUR
T1 - A survey of antenatal and peripartum provision of information on analgesia and anaesthesia
AU - the Pan-London Peri-operative Audit and research Network (PLAN)
AU - Brinkler, R.
AU - Edwards, Z.
AU - Abid, S.
AU - Oliver, C. M.
AU - Lo, Q.
AU - Stewart, A.
AU - Abayalingam, Mayavan
AU - Abid, Sonia
AU - Afzal, Safeena
AU - Aly, Hagar
AU - Kasi Anandan, Theanu
AU - Ariyanayagam, Rachel
AU - Armstrong, Sarah
AU - Ashiru, Gloria
AU - Barrett, Stephen
AU - Baytug, Beki
AU - Black, Rebecca
AU - Bowman, Sara
AU - Brayshaw, Samantha
AU - Brinkler, Rebecca
AU - Brocklesby, Sonia
AU - Cain, Joshua
AU - Casey, Philippa
AU - Chambers, Kyron
AU - Chan, Carolyn
AU - Chapman, Rachel
AU - Cheah, Clarissa
AU - Cheesman, Kate
AU - Cohen, Jolyon
AU - Cole, Abigail
AU - Combeer, Andrew
AU - Cowie, Vanessa
AU - Dabrowicz, Adrian
AU - Desai, Neel
AU - Donovan, Clare
AU - Doraiswami, Mano
AU - El Amin, Olivia
AU - Edwards, Zara
AU - Ellimah, Tracey
AU - Evans, Matt
AU - Fawcett, Eric
AU - Fletcher, Lydia
AU - Forman, Emma
AU - Fulton, Laura
AU - Gardener, Kate
AU - George, Richard
AU - Gorur, Paavan
AU - Gowripalann, T.
AU - Greenslade, Tessa
AU - Monks, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Association of Anaesthetists
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Pregnant women should receive information about what they might expect to experience during their delivery. Despite this, research shows many women are inadequately prepared for anaesthetic interventions during labour. We surveyed 903 postnatal women across 28 Greater London hospitals about: the analgesic and anaesthetic information that they recalled receiving during pregnancy and delivery; their confidence to make decisions on analgesia; and their satisfaction with the analgesia used. Wide variation was observed between hospitals. Overall, 67 of 749 (9.0%) women recalled receiving antenatal information covering all aspects of labour analgesia, and 108 of 889 (12.1%) covering anaesthesia for caesarean section. Regarding intrapartum information, 256 of 415 (61.7%) respondents recalled receiving thorough information before epidural insertion for labour analgesia, and 102 of 370 (27.6%) before anaesthesia for caesarean section. We found that 620 of 903 (68.7%) women felt well enough informed to be confident in their analgesic choices, and 675 of 903 (74.8%) stated that their analgesia was as expected or better. Receiving information verbally, regardless of provider, was the factor most strongly associated with respondents recalling receiving full information: odds ratio (95%CI) for labour analgesia 20.66 (8.98–47.53; p < 0.0001); epidural top-up for caesarean section 5.93 (1.57–22.35; p = 0.01); and general anaesthesia for caesarean section 12.39 (2.18–70.42; p = 0.01). A large proportion of respondents did not recall being fully informed before an anaesthetic intervention. Collaboration with current antenatal service providers, both in promoting information delivery and providing resources to assist with delivery, could improve the quality of information offered and women's retention of that information.
AB - Pregnant women should receive information about what they might expect to experience during their delivery. Despite this, research shows many women are inadequately prepared for anaesthetic interventions during labour. We surveyed 903 postnatal women across 28 Greater London hospitals about: the analgesic and anaesthetic information that they recalled receiving during pregnancy and delivery; their confidence to make decisions on analgesia; and their satisfaction with the analgesia used. Wide variation was observed between hospitals. Overall, 67 of 749 (9.0%) women recalled receiving antenatal information covering all aspects of labour analgesia, and 108 of 889 (12.1%) covering anaesthesia for caesarean section. Regarding intrapartum information, 256 of 415 (61.7%) respondents recalled receiving thorough information before epidural insertion for labour analgesia, and 102 of 370 (27.6%) before anaesthesia for caesarean section. We found that 620 of 903 (68.7%) women felt well enough informed to be confident in their analgesic choices, and 675 of 903 (74.8%) stated that their analgesia was as expected or better. Receiving information verbally, regardless of provider, was the factor most strongly associated with respondents recalling receiving full information: odds ratio (95%CI) for labour analgesia 20.66 (8.98–47.53; p < 0.0001); epidural top-up for caesarean section 5.93 (1.57–22.35; p = 0.01); and general anaesthesia for caesarean section 12.39 (2.18–70.42; p = 0.01). A large proportion of respondents did not recall being fully informed before an anaesthetic intervention. Collaboration with current antenatal service providers, both in promoting information delivery and providing resources to assist with delivery, could improve the quality of information offered and women's retention of that information.
KW - anaesthesia: epidural
KW - anaesthesia: obstetric
KW - anaesthesia: spinal
KW - caesarean section
KW - labour
KW - patient care
KW - questionnaire
KW - satisfaction
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85068235028
U2 - 10.1111/anae.14745
DO - 10.1111/anae.14745
M3 - Article
C2 - 31256437
AN - SCOPUS:85068235028
SN - 0003-2409
VL - 74
SP - 1101
EP - 1111
JO - Anaesthesia
JF - Anaesthesia
IS - 9
ER -