TY - JOUR
T1 - A superposition model of droplet exposure to SARS-CoV-2
AU - Bennett, James S.
AU - Mccarthy, John E.
AU - Dewitt, Barry
AU - Dumas, Bob
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© This work was authored as part of the Contributor’s official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - The relative role of droplets and aerosols in SARS-CoV-2 infection has been debated. We seek to quantify virion exposure in an enclosed space via short-range and long-range airborne transmission to inform public health decision making. Data from five published studies were analyzed to predict relative exposure at distances of 1 m and farther. A droplet size of 8 µm was used to compare data from published studies, while not defining particle transport behavior in terms of size. Results at 1 m from an infectious individual were a boundary condition to model infection risk at shorter and longer distances. At all distances, exposure was treated as the sum of all air routes. Number of virions was assumed proportional to particle volume. The largest exposure occurred close to the infectious individual, and out to approximately 1 m, direct deposition and airborne routes both contributed. Farther away, the largest exposure was airborne. For one model, short-range exposure disappeared at 1.8 m. Policy concerning physical distancing for infection reduction relies on exposure as a function of distance, yet within this construct, deposition varies. This two-fold distance effect can be used to evaluate control technology such as plexiglass barriers, masking, and ventilation.
AB - The relative role of droplets and aerosols in SARS-CoV-2 infection has been debated. We seek to quantify virion exposure in an enclosed space via short-range and long-range airborne transmission to inform public health decision making. Data from five published studies were analyzed to predict relative exposure at distances of 1 m and farther. A droplet size of 8 µm was used to compare data from published studies, while not defining particle transport behavior in terms of size. Results at 1 m from an infectious individual were a boundary condition to model infection risk at shorter and longer distances. At all distances, exposure was treated as the sum of all air routes. Number of virions was assumed proportional to particle volume. The largest exposure occurred close to the infectious individual, and out to approximately 1 m, direct deposition and airborne routes both contributed. Farther away, the largest exposure was airborne. For one model, short-range exposure disappeared at 1.8 m. Policy concerning physical distancing for infection reduction relies on exposure as a function of distance, yet within this construct, deposition varies. This two-fold distance effect can be used to evaluate control technology such as plexiglass barriers, masking, and ventilation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024783349
U2 - 10.1080/23744731.2025.2593790
DO - 10.1080/23744731.2025.2593790
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105024783349
SN - 2374-4731
VL - 32
SP - 281
EP - 291
JO - Science and Technology for the Built Environment
JF - Science and Technology for the Built Environment
IS - 2
ER -