TY - JOUR
T1 - A Review of the COVID-19 Mental Health Impact in Post-Conflict Settings
T2 - Bridging the Mental Health Gap with Case Exemplars from an Implementation Science Lens
AU - Noble, Elizabeth
AU - Adenikinju, Deborah
AU - Ruan, Christina
AU - Zuniga, Sophia
AU - Thakkar, Diksha
AU - Malburg, Carly M.
AU - Gyamfi, Joyce
AU - Ojo, Temitope
AU - Islam, Farha
AU - Diawara, Amy
AU - Dike, Lotanna
AU - Chukwu, Chinenye
AU - Tampubolon, Siphra
AU - Peprah, Emmanuel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - The COVID-19 pandemic has further aggravated the burden of mental health and presents an opportunity for public health research to focus on evidence-based interventions appropriate for populations residing in resource-constrained, post-conflict settings. Post-conflict settings have a higher service gap in mental health and fewer protective factors, such as economic and domestic security. Post-conflict settings are defined as locations where open warfare has ended but resulting challenges have remained for years. A strong emphasis on the engagement of diverse stakeholders is needed to arrive at sustainable and scalable solutions to mental health service delivery. This review discusses mental health service delivery gaps in post-conflict settings, highlights the urgency of the matter in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and provides recommendations for service gaps from evidence-based case study exemplars with an implementation science lens using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as guide to improving adaptation and uptake.
AB - The COVID-19 pandemic has further aggravated the burden of mental health and presents an opportunity for public health research to focus on evidence-based interventions appropriate for populations residing in resource-constrained, post-conflict settings. Post-conflict settings have a higher service gap in mental health and fewer protective factors, such as economic and domestic security. Post-conflict settings are defined as locations where open warfare has ended but resulting challenges have remained for years. A strong emphasis on the engagement of diverse stakeholders is needed to arrive at sustainable and scalable solutions to mental health service delivery. This review discusses mental health service delivery gaps in post-conflict settings, highlights the urgency of the matter in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, and provides recommendations for service gaps from evidence-based case study exemplars with an implementation science lens using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as guide to improving adaptation and uptake.
KW - CFIR
KW - COVID-19
KW - evidence-based interventions
KW - implementation science
KW - mental health
KW - post-conflict settings
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85161669959
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph20116006
DO - 10.3390/ijerph20116006
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 37297610
AN - SCOPUS:85161669959
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 20
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 11
M1 - 6006
ER -