A requirement for Notch1 distinguishes 2 phases of definitive hematopoiesis during development

Brandon K. Hadland, Stacey S. Huppert, Jyotshnabala Kanungo, Yingzi Xue, Rulang Jiang, Thomas Gridley, Ronald A. Conlon, Alec M. Cheng, Raphael Kopan, Gregory D. Longmore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

201 Scopus citations

Abstract

Notch1 is known to play a critical role in regulating fates in numerous cell types, including those of the hematopoietic lineage. Multiple defects exhibited by Notch1-deficient embryos confound the determination of Notch1 function in early hematopoietic development in vivo. To overcome this limitation, we examined the developmental potential of Notch1-/- embryonic stem (ES) cells by in vitro differentiation and by in vivo chimera analysis. Notch1 was found to affect primitive erythropoiesis differentially during ES cell differentiation and in vivo, and this result reflected an important difference in the regulation of Notch1 expression during ES cell differentiation relative to the developing mouse embryo. Notch1 was dispensable for the onset of definitive hematopoiesis both in vitro and in vivo in that Notch1-/- definitive progenitors could be detected in differentiating ES cells as well as in the yolk sac and early fetal liver of chimeric mice. Despite the fact that Notch1-/- cells can give rise to multiple types of definitive progenitors in early development, Notch1-/- cells failed to contribute to long-term definitive hematopoiesis past the early fetal liver stage In the context of a wild-type environment in chimeric mice. Thus, Notch1 is required, in a cell-autonomous manner, for the establishment of long-term, definitive hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3097-3105
Number of pages9
JournalBlood
Volume104
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 15 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A requirement for Notch1 distinguishes 2 phases of definitive hematopoiesis during development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this