A Recovery-Oriented Intervention for People With Psychosis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Franco Mascayano
  • , Ruben Alvarado
  • , Howard F. Andrews
  • , Joy N. Baumgartner
  • , Maria Soledad Burrone
  • , Jacqueline Cintra
  • , Sarah Conover
  • , Catarina M. Dahl
  • , Kim M. Fader
  • , Prakash Gorroochurn
  • , Sandro Galea
  • , Maria J. Jorquera
  • , Giovanni M. Lovisi
  • , Flavia Mitkiewicz de Souza
  • , Charissa Pratt
  • , Maria E. Restrepo-Toro
  • , Graciela Rojas
  • , Keli Rodrigues Sarução
  • , Robert Rosenheck
  • , Sara Schilling
  • Tom Shriver, Peter Stastny, Eric Tapia, Maria Tavares Cavalcanti, Eliecer Valencia, Lawrence H. Yang, Alexandra Restrepo Henao, Gonzalo Martínez-Alés, Victor Romero Pardo, Teresa Gomez Alemany, Ezra Susser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of critical time intervention–task shifting (CTI-TS) for people with psychosis in Santiago, Chile, and Rio de Janeiro. CTI-TS is a 9-month intervention involving peer support workers and is designed to maintain treatment effects up to 18 months. Methods: A total of 110 people with psychosis were recruited when they enrolled in community mental health clinics (Santiago, N560; Rio de Janeiro, N550). Participants within each city were randomly assigned to either CTI-TS or usual care for 9 months. Primary outcomes were quality of life, measured with the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment–Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF), and unmet needs, measured with the Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN), at 18-month follow-up. Results were analyzed according to intention-to-treat guidelines. Generalized estimating equations, with observations clustered within cities, and multiple imputation for missing data were used. Results: At 18 months, both groups showed improved primary outcomes. In both unadjusted and fully adjusted analyses, no significant differences between CTI-TS and usual care (WHOQOL-BREF question on quality of life and CAN mean number of unmet needs) were found. Conclusions: Three factors might explain the lack of difference between CTI-TS and usual care: first-contact enrollment precluded rapport prior to randomization, a minority of patients were uncomfortable with peers being on the treatment team, and primary outcome measures may not have been sensitive enough to capture the effects of a recovery-oriented intervention. The results have implications for the design of transitional services for people with psychosis, especially in Latin America.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1225-1231
Number of pages7
JournalPsychiatric Services
Volume73
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Recovery-Oriented Intervention for People With Psychosis: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this