A randomized trial of buffered versus nonbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine for cervical loop excision

Nora T. Kizer, Qiuhong Zhao, Jeffrey F. Peipert, Yevgeniya Ioffe, L. Stewart Massad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our study evaluated whether buffering reduces pain from lidocaine injection for loop electrosurgical excisional procedures (LEEPs) of the cervix when compared to unbuffered lidocaine. METHODS: Women undergoing outpatient LEEPs were randomized to receive either buffered or unbuffered lidocaine. Participants, caregivers, and statisticians were blinded to treatment allocation. Pain was categorized as injection, procedure, or cramping pain. Severity of pain was reported using a Likert visual analog scale and compared using Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects received buffered lidocaine and 24 subjects received unbuffered lidocaine. The 2 groups were similar in regard to age, race, previous LEEP, anesthetic volume used, and loop size. Mean scores were similar between the nonbuffered and buffered groups for injection pain (25 vs 19, p = .13), procedure pain (27 vs 19, p = .08), and cramping pain (19 vs 18, p = .86). CONCLUSIONS: Pain scores with subepithelial lidocaine plus epinephrine for LEEP are low and are not significantly reduced by buffering the anesthetic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-12
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of lower genital tract disease
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Keywords

  • LEEPs
  • buffered lidocaine
  • pain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomized trial of buffered versus nonbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine for cervical loop excision'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this