TY - JOUR
T1 - A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Implementation of BREASTChoice, a Multilevel Breast Reconstruction Decision Support Tool With Personalized Risk Prediction
AU - Politi, Mary C.
AU - Myckatyn, Terence M.
AU - Cooksey, Krista
AU - Olsen, Margaret
AU - Smith, Rachel M.
AU - Foraker, Randi
AU - Parrish, Katelyn
AU - Phommasathit, Crystal
AU - Brock, Guy
AU - Janse, Sarah
AU - Guglielmino, Janine
AU - Peled, Anne
AU - Mills, Paul B.
AU - Jackson, Sherrill
AU - Lee, Clara N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Objective: To implement the BREASTChoice decision tool into the electronic health record and evaluate its effectiveness. Background: BREASTChoice, is a multilevel decision tool that: 1) educates patients about breast reconstruction; 2) estimates personalized risk of complications; 3) clarifies patient preferences; and 4) informs clinicians about patients’ risk and preferences. Methods: A multisite randomized controlled trial enrolled adult women with stage 0-III breast malignancy undergoing mastectomy. Participants were randomized to BREASTChoice or a control website. A survey assessed knowledge, preferences, decisional conflict, shared decision-making, preferred treatment, and usability. We conducted intent-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP) analyses (those randomized to BREASTChoice who accessed the tool), and stratified analyses. Results: 23/25 eligible clinicians enrolled. 369/761 (48%) contacted patients enrolled and were randomized. Patients' average age was 51 years; 15% were older than 65. BREASTChoice participants had higher knowledge than control participants (ITT: mean 70.6 vs. 67.4, p=0.08; PP: mean 71.4 vs. 67.4, p=0.03), especially when stratified by site (ITT: p=0.04, PP: p=0.01), age (ITT: p=0.04, PP: p=0.02), and race (ITT: p=0.04, PP: p=0.01). BREASTChoice did not improve decisional conflict, match between preferences and treatment, or shared decision-making. In PP analyses, fewer high-risk patients using BREASTChoice chose reconstruction. BREASTChoice had high usability. Conclusions: BREASTChoice is a novel decision tool incorporating risk prediction, patient education, and clinician engagement. Patients using BREASTChoice had higher knowledge; older adults and those from racially minoritized backgrounds especially benefitted. There was no impact on other decision outcomes. Future studies should overcome implementation barriers and specifically examine decision outcomes among high-risk patients.
AB - Objective: To implement the BREASTChoice decision tool into the electronic health record and evaluate its effectiveness. Background: BREASTChoice, is a multilevel decision tool that: 1) educates patients about breast reconstruction; 2) estimates personalized risk of complications; 3) clarifies patient preferences; and 4) informs clinicians about patients’ risk and preferences. Methods: A multisite randomized controlled trial enrolled adult women with stage 0-III breast malignancy undergoing mastectomy. Participants were randomized to BREASTChoice or a control website. A survey assessed knowledge, preferences, decisional conflict, shared decision-making, preferred treatment, and usability. We conducted intent-to-treat (ITT), per-protocol (PP) analyses (those randomized to BREASTChoice who accessed the tool), and stratified analyses. Results: 23/25 eligible clinicians enrolled. 369/761 (48%) contacted patients enrolled and were randomized. Patients' average age was 51 years; 15% were older than 65. BREASTChoice participants had higher knowledge than control participants (ITT: mean 70.6 vs. 67.4, p=0.08; PP: mean 71.4 vs. 67.4, p=0.03), especially when stratified by site (ITT: p=0.04, PP: p=0.01), age (ITT: p=0.04, PP: p=0.02), and race (ITT: p=0.04, PP: p=0.01). BREASTChoice did not improve decisional conflict, match between preferences and treatment, or shared decision-making. In PP analyses, fewer high-risk patients using BREASTChoice chose reconstruction. BREASTChoice had high usability. Conclusions: BREASTChoice is a novel decision tool incorporating risk prediction, patient education, and clinician engagement. Patients using BREASTChoice had higher knowledge; older adults and those from racially minoritized backgrounds especially benefitted. There was no impact on other decision outcomes. Future studies should overcome implementation barriers and specifically examine decision outcomes among high-risk patients.
KW - breast cancer
KW - breast reconstruction
KW - clinical decision support
KW - shared decision making
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85199530410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006354
DO - 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006354
M3 - Article
C2 - 38801247
AN - SCOPUS:85199530410
SN - 0003-4932
JO - Annals of surgery
JF - Annals of surgery
ER -