A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial Examining the Impact of an Emergency Department Mechanical Ventilator Protocol on Clinical Outcomes and Lung-Protective Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Brian M. Fuller, Ian T. Ferguson, Nicholas M. Mohr, Anne M. Drewry, Christopher Palmer, Brian T. Wessman, Enyo Ablordeppey, Jacob Keeperman, Robert J. Stephens, Cristopher C. Briscoe, Angelina A. Kolomiets, Richard S. Hotchkiss, Marin H. Kollef

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of an emergency department mechanical ventilation protocol on clinical outcomes and adherence to lung-protective ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Design: Quasi-experimental, before-after trial. Setting: Emergency department and ICUs of an academic center. Patients: Mechanically ventilated emergency department patients experiencing acute respiratory distress syndrome while in the emergency department or after admission to the ICU. Interventions: An emergency department ventilator protocol which targeted variables in need of quality improvement, as identified by prior work: 1) lung-protective tidal volume, 2) appropriate setting of positive end-expiratory pressure, 3) oxygen weaning, and 4) head-of-bed elevation. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 229 patients (186 preintervention group, 43 intervention group) were studied. In the emergency department, the intervention was associated with significant changes (p < 0.01 for all) in tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen administration, and head-of-bed elevation. There was a reduction in emergency department tidal volume from 8.1 mL/kg predicted body weight (7.0-9.1) to 6.4 mL/kg predicted body weight (6.1-6.7) and an increase in lung-protective ventilation from 11.1% to 61.5%, p value of less than 0.01. The intervention was associated with a reduction in mortality from 54.8% to 39.5% (odds ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.83; p = 0.02) and a 3.9 day increase in ventilator-free days, p value equals to 0.01. Conclusions: This before-after study of mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome demonstrates that implementing a mechanical ventilator protocol in the emergency department is feasible and associated with improved clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)645-652
Number of pages8
JournalCritical care medicine
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2017

Keywords

  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • emergency department
  • lung-protective ventilation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Quasi-Experimental, Before-After Trial Examining the Impact of an Emergency Department Mechanical Ventilator Protocol on Clinical Outcomes and Lung-Protective Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this