A qualitative exploration of disseminating research findings among public health researchers in China

  • Yiluan Hu
  • , Xuejun Yin
  • , Yachen Wang
  • , Enying Gong
  • , Xin Xin
  • , Jing Liu
  • , Xia Liu
  • , Ruitai Shao
  • , Juan Zhang
  • , Ross C. Brownson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Research dissemination is essential to accelerate the translating of evidence into practice. Little is known about dissemination among Chinese public health researchers. This study aimed to explore the understanding and practices of disseminating research findings and to identify barriers and facilitators that influence dissemination activities to non-research audiences. Methods: This study deployed an exploratory qualitative design with purposive and snowball sampling. One focus group with 5 participants and 12 in-depth interviews were conducted with participants working in diverse fields from universities (n = 10), the National Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (n = 4), the Chinese National Cancer Center (n = 1), the Chinese National Center for Cardiovascular Disease (n = 1), and China office of a global research institute (n = 1) from May to December 2021 to reach saturation. Data were initially analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The designing for dissemination (D4D) logic model was then used to organize themes and subthemes. Two coders independently coded all transcripts and discussed disparities to reach a consensus. Results: Out of 17 participants, 12 misunderstood the concept of dissemination; 14 had disseminated to non-research audiences: 10 to the public, 10 to practitioners, and 9 to policymakers. We identified multiple barriers to dissemination to non-research audiences across four phases of the D4D logic model, including low priority of dissemination, limited application of D4D strategies, insufficient support from the research organizations, practice settings, and health systems, and overemphasis on academic publications. Conclusions: There was a lack of understanding and experience of dissemination, indicating a lack of emphasis on active dissemination in China. We provide implications for raising awareness, building capacity, facilitating multidisciplinary collaboration, providing incentives and infrastructure, changing climate and culture, establishing communication and executive networks, and accelerating systematic shifts in impact focus.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2518
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024

Keywords

  • Barriers
  • China
  • Dissemination
  • Evidence-based
  • Public health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A qualitative exploration of disseminating research findings among public health researchers in China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this