TY - JOUR
T1 - A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of fibrin pad as an adjunct to control soft tissue bleeding during abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, and thoracic surgery
AU - Fischer, Craig P.
AU - Bochicchio, Grant
AU - Shen, Jessica
AU - Patel, Bababhai
AU - Batiller, Jonathan
AU - Hart, James C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosure Information: This study was supported by Ethicon, Inc. , a Johnson & Johnson company, Somerville, NJ. Drs Patel, Hart, and Shen, and Mr Batiller are salaried employees of Ethicon, Inc. Dr Bochicchio receives compensation for research as an investigator, and honoraria for consulting from Ethicon, Inc. Dr Fischer has nothing to disclose. Drs Fischer and Bochicchio were not compensated for writing this manuscript and retained full editorial control over the content of the manuscript.
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge contributions of the following individuals: Gerry Leighton, Nicolas Aguirre, Cristina Dyogi, and David Shah (all Ethicon employees). Additional statistical consultation was provided by David Snead, PhD. Editorial support for the writing of this manuscript was provided by Ashley O'Dunne, PhD, of MedErgy, and was funded by Ethicon, Inc .
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - Background: This study evaluated the hemostatic effectiveness and safety of Fibrin Pad (Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.) vs absorbable hemostat in patients undergoing nonemergent surgery. Fibrin Pad is a topical absorbable hemostat designed to be effective in a variety of soft tissues and across multiple bleeding intensities. Study Design: Patients 18 years and older, requiring abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic (noncardiac) surgery and with an appropriate soft-tissue target bleeding site (TBS), were randomized to receive Fibrin Pad or absorbable hemostat (NCT00658723). Patients were stratified by bleeding severity at the TBS. Assessments included percentage of patients achieving hemostasis at 4 minutes after randomization with no rebleeding requiring treatment during the subsequent 6 minutes (primary endpoint), proportion of patients achieving hemostasis at 10 minutes, and incidence of treatment failure. Results: On the primary endpoint, 98.3% of patients with Fibrin Pad and 53.3% with absorbable hemostat achieved hemostasis at 4 minutes (p < 0.0001). The treatment differential was magnified (efficacy was maintained with Fibrin Pad but decreased with absorbable hemostat) with increasing bleeding intensity: in patients with mild bleeding, 100.0% vs 80.0% achieved hemostasis with Fibrin Pad and absorbable hemostat (p = 0.03), respectively; rates were 96.6% vs 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001) with moderate bleeding. Percentages of patients who achieved hemostasis at 10 minutes were: Fibrin Pad, 98.3% and absorbable hemostat, 73.3% (p < 0.0001). Incidences of adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Fibrin Pad is superior to absorbable hemostat (SURGICEL Original Absorbable Hemostat [Ethicon]) in soft-tissue bleeding control and is safe and effective as an adjunct for rapidly and reliably achieving hemostasis for soft-tissue bleeding during surgery.
AB - Background: This study evaluated the hemostatic effectiveness and safety of Fibrin Pad (Omrix Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.) vs absorbable hemostat in patients undergoing nonemergent surgery. Fibrin Pad is a topical absorbable hemostat designed to be effective in a variety of soft tissues and across multiple bleeding intensities. Study Design: Patients 18 years and older, requiring abdominal, retroperitoneal, pelvic, or thoracic (noncardiac) surgery and with an appropriate soft-tissue target bleeding site (TBS), were randomized to receive Fibrin Pad or absorbable hemostat (NCT00658723). Patients were stratified by bleeding severity at the TBS. Assessments included percentage of patients achieving hemostasis at 4 minutes after randomization with no rebleeding requiring treatment during the subsequent 6 minutes (primary endpoint), proportion of patients achieving hemostasis at 10 minutes, and incidence of treatment failure. Results: On the primary endpoint, 98.3% of patients with Fibrin Pad and 53.3% with absorbable hemostat achieved hemostasis at 4 minutes (p < 0.0001). The treatment differential was magnified (efficacy was maintained with Fibrin Pad but decreased with absorbable hemostat) with increasing bleeding intensity: in patients with mild bleeding, 100.0% vs 80.0% achieved hemostasis with Fibrin Pad and absorbable hemostat (p = 0.03), respectively; rates were 96.6% vs 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001) with moderate bleeding. Percentages of patients who achieved hemostasis at 10 minutes were: Fibrin Pad, 98.3% and absorbable hemostat, 73.3% (p < 0.0001). Incidences of adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Fibrin Pad is superior to absorbable hemostat (SURGICEL Original Absorbable Hemostat [Ethicon]) in soft-tissue bleeding control and is safe and effective as an adjunct for rapidly and reliably achieving hemostasis for soft-tissue bleeding during surgery.
KW - AE
KW - ITT
KW - TBS
KW - adverse event
KW - intention to treat
KW - target bleeding site
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882749147&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.036
DO - 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.036
M3 - Article
C2 - 23969113
AN - SCOPUS:84882749147
SN - 1072-7515
VL - 217
SP - 385
EP - 393
JO - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
JF - Journal of the American College of Surgeons
IS - 3
ER -