A prospective comparison of the impact of uterine artery embolization, myomectomy, and hysterectomy on ovarian function

David M. Hovsepian, Valerie S. Ratts, Michael Rodriguez, Jessica S. Huang, Mira G. Aubuchon, Thomas K. Pilgram

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare uterine artery embolization (UAE) versus myomectomy and hysterectomy with regard to ovarian function as measured by postprocedure follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels and symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients were prospectively enrolled in the study: 33 patients who underwent UAE, seven who underwent myomectomy, and 15 who underwent hysterectomy. Patients had serum FSH and estradiol levels measured on the third day of the menstrual cycle before their procedure and at regular follow-up visits for as long as 6 months. At these intervals, patients were also surveyed regarding menopausal symptoms. RESULTS: Although a mild transient increase in mean FSH level after UAE was noted at 3 months, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in mean FSH levels at 1 month, 3 months, or 6 months of follow-up. Menopausal symptoms arose in the UAE and hysterectomy groups, but there was no statistically significant difference or permanent effect in either group. CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in impact on ovarian function after UAE, hysterectomy, or myomectomy at follow-up for a maximum of 6 months.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1111-1115
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
Volume17
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2006

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A prospective comparison of the impact of uterine artery embolization, myomectomy, and hysterectomy on ovarian function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this