TY - JOUR
T1 - A phase II study of two topotecan regimens evaluated in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer
T2 - A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (GOG 146Q)
AU - Herzog, Thomas J.
AU - Sill, Michael W.
AU - Walker, Joan L.
AU - O'Malley, David
AU - Shahin, Mark
AU - Degeest, Koen
AU - Weiner, Sheldon A.
AU - Mutch, David
AU - Debernardo, Robert L.
AU - Lentz, Samuel S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by National Cancer Institute grants to the Gynecologic Oncology Group Administrative Office (CA 27469) and the Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical Office (CA 37517). The following Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions participated in the primary treatment studies: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Abington Memorial Hospital, University of Cincinnati, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, University of California Medical Center at Irvine, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Washington University School of Medicine, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Columbus Cancer Council, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Women's Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, University of Chicago, Case Western Reserve University, Women and Infants Hospital, The Hospital of Central Connecticut, and William Beaumont CCOP.
PY - 2011/3
Y1 - 2011/3
N2 - Objective.: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinomas. Methods.: A randomized phase II analysis of platinum-sensitive patients with measurable disease was performed independently assessing intravenous topotecan 1.25 mg/m2 daily × 5 every 21 days (regimen I) and topotecan 4.0 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (regimen II). All patients were treated until disease progression, unmanageable toxicity, or patient refusal. Insufficient accrual related to regimen I resulted in a redesign of the study as a single arm phase II trial assessing only regimen II. More complete efficacy data is presented for regimen II as enrollment on regimen I was insufficient for some analyses. Results.: A total of 81 patients were enrolled. One patient was ineligible. Fifteen patients received regimen I, while 65 patients were treated with regimen II. The response rate on regimen I (daily × 5) was 27% (90% CI: 10-51%) and 12% (90% CI: 6-21%) on regimen II (weekly). The median PFS and OS were 4.8 and 27.8 months, respectively, for regimen II. Grade 3/4 neutropenia rate was 93% with daily × 5 dosing and 28% for weekly treatment. Febrile neutropenia was very low in both groups. Conclusion.: The weekly regimen of topotecan appeared less active but resulted in less toxicity than the daily regimen in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients.
AB - Objective.: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, and fallopian tube carcinomas. Methods.: A randomized phase II analysis of platinum-sensitive patients with measurable disease was performed independently assessing intravenous topotecan 1.25 mg/m2 daily × 5 every 21 days (regimen I) and topotecan 4.0 mg/m2/day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle (regimen II). All patients were treated until disease progression, unmanageable toxicity, or patient refusal. Insufficient accrual related to regimen I resulted in a redesign of the study as a single arm phase II trial assessing only regimen II. More complete efficacy data is presented for regimen II as enrollment on regimen I was insufficient for some analyses. Results.: A total of 81 patients were enrolled. One patient was ineligible. Fifteen patients received regimen I, while 65 patients were treated with regimen II. The response rate on regimen I (daily × 5) was 27% (90% CI: 10-51%) and 12% (90% CI: 6-21%) on regimen II (weekly). The median PFS and OS were 4.8 and 27.8 months, respectively, for regimen II. Grade 3/4 neutropenia rate was 93% with daily × 5 dosing and 28% for weekly treatment. Febrile neutropenia was very low in both groups. Conclusion.: The weekly regimen of topotecan appeared less active but resulted in less toxicity than the daily regimen in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients.
KW - Platinum sensitive
KW - Recurrent ovarian cancer
KW - Topotecan
KW - Weekly chemotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951579430&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.11.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 21168198
AN - SCOPUS:79951579430
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 120
SP - 454
EP - 458
JO - Gynecologic oncology
JF - Gynecologic oncology
IS - 3
ER -