TY - JOUR
T1 - A Novel Biosignature Identifies Patients With DCIS With High Risk of Local Recurrence After Breast Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy
AU - Vicini, Frank A.
AU - Mann, G. Bruce
AU - Shah, Chirag
AU - Weinmann, Sheila
AU - Leo, Michael C.
AU - Whitworth, Pat
AU - Rabinovitch, Rachel
AU - Torres, Mylin A.
AU - Margenthaler, Julie A.
AU - Dabbs, David
AU - Savala, Jess
AU - Shivers, Steven C.
AU - Mittal, Karuna
AU - Wärnberg, Fredrik
AU - Bremer, Troy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2023/1/1
Y1 - 2023/1/1
N2 - Purpose: There is an unmet need to identify women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with a low risk of in-breast recurrence (IBR) after breast conserving surgery (BCS), which could omit radiation therapy (RT), and also to identify those with elevated IBR risk remaining after BCS plus RT. We evaluated a novel biosignature for a residual risk subtype (RRt) to help identify patients with elevated IBR risk after BCS plus RT. Methods and Materials: Women with DCIS treated with BCS with or without RT at centers in the US, Australia, and Sweden (n = 926) were evaluated. Patients were classified into 3 biosignature risk groups using the decision score (DS) and the RRt category: (1) Low Risk (DS ≤2.8 without RRt), (2) Elevated Risk (DS >2.8 without RRt), and (3) Residual Risk (DS >2.8 with RRt). Total and invasive IBR rates were assessed by risk group and treatment. Results: In patients at low risk, there was no significant difference in IBR rates with or without RT (total, P =.8; invasive IBR, P =.7), and there were low overall 10-year rates (total, 5.1%; invasive, 2.7%). In patients with elevated risk, IBR rates were decreased with RT (total: hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; P <.001; invasive: HR, 0.28; P =.005); 10-year rates were 20.6% versus 4.9% (total) and 10.9% versus 3.1% (invasive). In patients with residual risk, although IBR rates decreased with RT after BCS (total: HR, 0.21; P <.001; invasive: HR, 0.29; P =.028), IBR rates remained significantly higher after RT compared with patients with elevated risk (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.4; P =.018), with 10-year rates of 42.1% versus 14.7% (total) and 18.3% versus 6.5% (invasive). Conclusions: The novel biosignature identified patients with 3 distinct risk profiles: Low Risk patients with a low recurrence risk with or without adjuvant RT, Elevated Risk patients with excellent outcomes after BCS plus RT, and Residual Risk patients with an elevated recurrence risk remaining after BCS plus RT, warranting potential intensified or alternative treatment approaches.
AB - Purpose: There is an unmet need to identify women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with a low risk of in-breast recurrence (IBR) after breast conserving surgery (BCS), which could omit radiation therapy (RT), and also to identify those with elevated IBR risk remaining after BCS plus RT. We evaluated a novel biosignature for a residual risk subtype (RRt) to help identify patients with elevated IBR risk after BCS plus RT. Methods and Materials: Women with DCIS treated with BCS with or without RT at centers in the US, Australia, and Sweden (n = 926) were evaluated. Patients were classified into 3 biosignature risk groups using the decision score (DS) and the RRt category: (1) Low Risk (DS ≤2.8 without RRt), (2) Elevated Risk (DS >2.8 without RRt), and (3) Residual Risk (DS >2.8 with RRt). Total and invasive IBR rates were assessed by risk group and treatment. Results: In patients at low risk, there was no significant difference in IBR rates with or without RT (total, P =.8; invasive IBR, P =.7), and there were low overall 10-year rates (total, 5.1%; invasive, 2.7%). In patients with elevated risk, IBR rates were decreased with RT (total: hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; P <.001; invasive: HR, 0.28; P =.005); 10-year rates were 20.6% versus 4.9% (total) and 10.9% versus 3.1% (invasive). In patients with residual risk, although IBR rates decreased with RT after BCS (total: HR, 0.21; P <.001; invasive: HR, 0.29; P =.028), IBR rates remained significantly higher after RT compared with patients with elevated risk (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-5.4; P =.018), with 10-year rates of 42.1% versus 14.7% (total) and 18.3% versus 6.5% (invasive). Conclusions: The novel biosignature identified patients with 3 distinct risk profiles: Low Risk patients with a low recurrence risk with or without adjuvant RT, Elevated Risk patients with excellent outcomes after BCS plus RT, and Residual Risk patients with an elevated recurrence risk remaining after BCS plus RT, warranting potential intensified or alternative treatment approaches.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138053473&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.072
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.072
M3 - Article
C2 - 36115740
AN - SCOPUS:85138053473
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 115
SP - 93
EP - 102
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 1
ER -