A multicenter evaluation of diagnostic tools to define endpoints for programs to eliminate bancroftian filariasis

Katherine Gass, Madsen V.E.B. de Rochars, Daniel Boakye, Mark Bradley, Peter U. Fischer, John Gyapong, Makoto Itoh, Nese Ituaso-Conway, Hayley Joseph, Dominique Kyelem, Sandra J. Laney, Anne Marie Legrand, Tilaka S. Liyanage, Wayne Melrose, Khalfan Mohammed, Nils Pilotte, Eric A. Ottesen, Catherine Plichart, Kapa Ramaiah, Ramakrishna U. RaoJeffrey Talbot, Gary J. Weil, Steven A. Williams, Kimberly Y. Won, Patrick Lammie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

Successful mass drug administration (MDA) campaigns have brought several countries near the point of Lymphatic Filariasis (LF) elimination. A diagnostic tool is needed to determine when the prevalence levels have decreased to a point that MDA campaigns can be discontinued without the threat of recrudescence. A six-country study was conducted assessing the performance of seven diagnostic tests, including tests for microfilariae (blood smear, PCR), parasite antigen (ICT, Og4C3) and antifilarial antibody (Bm14, PanLF, Urine SXP). One community survey and one school survey were performed in each country. A total of 8,513 people from the six countries participated in the study, 6,443 through community surveys and 2,070 through school surveys. Specimens from these participants were used to conduct 49,585 diagnostic tests. Each test was seen to have both positive and negative attributes, but overall, the ICT test was found to be 76% sensitive at detecting microfilaremia and 93% specific at identifying individuals negative for both microfilariae and antifilarial antibody; the Og4C3 test was 87% sensitive and 95% specific. We conclude, however, that the ICT should be the primary tool recommended for decision-making about stopping MDAs. As a point-of-care diagnostic, the ICT is relatively inexpensive, requires no laboratory equipment, has satisfactory sensitivity and specificity and can be processed in 10 minutes-qualities consistent with programmatic use. Og4C3 provides a satisfactory laboratory-based diagnostic alternative.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere1479
JournalPLoS neglected tropical diseases
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A multicenter evaluation of diagnostic tools to define endpoints for programs to eliminate bancroftian filariasis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Gass, K., de Rochars, M. V. E. B., Boakye, D., Bradley, M., Fischer, P. U., Gyapong, J., Itoh, M., Ituaso-Conway, N., Joseph, H., Kyelem, D., Laney, S. J., Legrand, A. M., Liyanage, T. S., Melrose, W., Mohammed, K., Pilotte, N., Ottesen, E. A., Plichart, C., Ramaiah, K., ... Lammie, P. (2012). A multicenter evaluation of diagnostic tools to define endpoints for programs to eliminate bancroftian filariasis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 6(1), [e1479]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001479