A Multi-Level Examination of Stakeholder Perspectives of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Large Urban Publicly-Funded Mental Health System

Rinad S. Beidas, Rebecca E. Stewart, Danielle R. Adams, Tara Fernandez, Susanna Lustbader, Byron J. Powell, Gregory A. Aarons, Kimberly E. Hoagwood, Arthur C. Evans, Matthew O. Hurford, Ronnie Rubin, Trevor Hadley, David S. Mandell, Frances K. Barg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

94 Scopus citations

Abstract

Our goal was to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based practices from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders in a large publicly funded mental health system. We completed 56 interviews with three stakeholder groups: treatment developers (n = 7), agency administrators (n = 33), and system leadership (n = 16). The three stakeholder groups converged on the importance of inner (e.g., agency competing resources and demands, therapist educational background) and outer context (e.g., funding) factors as barriers to implementation. Potential threats to implementation and sustainability included the fiscal landscape of community mental health clinics and an evolving workforce. Intervention characteristics were rarely endorsed as barriers. Inner context, outer context, and intervention characteristics were all seen as important facilitators. All stakeholders endorsed the importance of coordinated collaboration across stakeholder groups within the system to successfully implement evidence-based practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)893-908
Number of pages16
JournalAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Keywords

  • Evidence-based practices
  • Implementation
  • Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Multi-Level Examination of Stakeholder Perspectives of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Large Urban Publicly-Funded Mental Health System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this