TY - JOUR
T1 - A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study of Neurosarcoidosis Myelitis
T2 - Current Observations and Future Directions
AU - Manzano, Giovanna S.
AU - Balaban, Denis
AU - Zhang, Yihan
AU - Healy, Brian
AU - Chwalisz, Bart K.
AU - Levy, Michael
AU - Venna, Nagagopal
AU - Stern, Barney J.
AU - Pardo, Carlos A.
AU - Barreras, Paula
AU - Rjeily, Nicole Bou
AU - Flanagan, Eoin P.
AU - Redenbaugh, Vyanka
AU - Aksamit, Allen J.
AU - Hutto, Spencer
AU - Herman, Max
AU - El Sammak, Sally
AU - Rodriguez, Elsa C.
AU - Snider, Laura
AU - Rains, Hannah
AU - Montalvo, Mayra
AU - Rempe, Torge
AU - Ramirez, Sergi Martinez
AU - Horta, Lucas
AU - Clardy, Stacey
AU - Lord, Jennifer
AU - Cho, Tracey A.
AU - Abdel Wahed, Lama
AU - Berger, Joseph R.
AU - Samudralwar, Rohini D.
AU - Torres, Noellie Rivera
AU - Clifford, David B.
AU - Dunham, Steven Richard
AU - Majed, Masoud
AU - Zabeti, Aram
AU - Marcucci, Samuel
AU - Mao-Draayer, Yang
AU - Doty, Jon
AU - Agyei, Paunel B.
AU - Bhattacharyya, Shamik
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Objective: The optimal treatment for neurosarcoidosis myelitis is uncertain. We characterize incident neurosarcoidosis myelitis and assess treatment response by MRI and clinical scales. Methods: Incident probable or definite neurosarcoidosis myelitis in adults was retrospectively identified from 13 academic medical centers. Cases were analyzed by initial treatment. The primary outcome was T1 post-contrast gadolinium enhancement resolution at 6 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from nadir to final follow-up. Results: Two hundred two patients were identified (median diagnosis age: 47 years (IQR 39–55); male: female 1.3:1). Median nadir mRS and EDSS were 2 (IQR 2–3) and 4 (IQR 2.5–6). At initial treatment, 129 (63.9%) received prolonged corticosteroids ≥ 4 weeks (group A1), 36 (17.8%) received corticosteroids < 4 weeks (B1), 21 (10.4%) received corticosteroids plus sarcoidosis-directed immunosuppressant (E), and 16 (7.9%) received corticosteroids plus non-sarcoidosis-directed agents (F). In 167 cases with sufficient imaging, there were no significant differences in contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months (A1 27/106 (25.5%), B1 9/28 (32.1%), E 5/19 (26.3%), F 5/14 (35.7%); Fisher's exact p = 0.76). There were no significant differences in changes in mRS or EDSS among treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.69 and 0.63, respectively) after median follow-up of 46.5 months (IQR 18–91.3). Interpretation: Different initial immunosuppression strategies did not correlate with MRI contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months or clinical scales (mRS, EDSS). However, conclusions are limited by retrospective design, imbalanced cohorts, and insensitivity of binary MRI outcomes and available clinical scales for treatment response in neurosarcoidosis.
AB - Objective: The optimal treatment for neurosarcoidosis myelitis is uncertain. We characterize incident neurosarcoidosis myelitis and assess treatment response by MRI and clinical scales. Methods: Incident probable or definite neurosarcoidosis myelitis in adults was retrospectively identified from 13 academic medical centers. Cases were analyzed by initial treatment. The primary outcome was T1 post-contrast gadolinium enhancement resolution at 6 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from nadir to final follow-up. Results: Two hundred two patients were identified (median diagnosis age: 47 years (IQR 39–55); male: female 1.3:1). Median nadir mRS and EDSS were 2 (IQR 2–3) and 4 (IQR 2.5–6). At initial treatment, 129 (63.9%) received prolonged corticosteroids ≥ 4 weeks (group A1), 36 (17.8%) received corticosteroids < 4 weeks (B1), 21 (10.4%) received corticosteroids plus sarcoidosis-directed immunosuppressant (E), and 16 (7.9%) received corticosteroids plus non-sarcoidosis-directed agents (F). In 167 cases with sufficient imaging, there were no significant differences in contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months (A1 27/106 (25.5%), B1 9/28 (32.1%), E 5/19 (26.3%), F 5/14 (35.7%); Fisher's exact p = 0.76). There were no significant differences in changes in mRS or EDSS among treatment groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.69 and 0.63, respectively) after median follow-up of 46.5 months (IQR 18–91.3). Interpretation: Different initial immunosuppression strategies did not correlate with MRI contrast enhancement resolution at 6 months or clinical scales (mRS, EDSS). However, conclusions are limited by retrospective design, imbalanced cohorts, and insensitivity of binary MRI outcomes and available clinical scales for treatment response in neurosarcoidosis.
KW - myelitis
KW - neuroimmunology
KW - neurosarcoidosis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105018646878
U2 - 10.1002/acn3.70200
DO - 10.1002/acn3.70200
M3 - Article
C2 - 40963302
AN - SCOPUS:105018646878
SN - 2328-9503
VL - 12
SP - 2589
EP - 2599
JO - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
JF - Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
IS - 12
ER -