TY - JOUR
T1 - A Model for Assessment of Catheterization Risk in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease
AU - Taggart, Nathaniel W.
AU - Du, Wei
AU - Forbes, Thomas J.
AU - Nykanen, David G.
AU - Wax, David F.
AU - Cabalka, Allison K.
AU - Reeves, Jaxk H.
AU - Du, Yan
AU - Kobayashi, Daisuke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - The purpose of this study was to define the risk for adults with congenital heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterization and to propose a precatheterization risk scoring system. Data were prospectively collected using a multicenter registry of the Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium. The occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE) was correlated with 12 predefined variables. Catheterization RISk in Adult patients (CRISA) score was derived using multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination model selection method. The CRISA score was compared with the American Society of Anesthesiology score and a consensus-derived, 20-point risk score based on their ability to predict SAE. From June 2008 to September 2017, 300 adjudicated SAE's occurred in 7317 catheterization procedures (overall SAE rate 4.1%) performed in adults over 18 years of age at 27 contributing centers. Nine of the 12 tested variables were ultimately included in the CRISA score. CRISA score positively correlated with risk of SAE, and was superior to American Society of Anesthesiology and the 20-point risk score in predicting SAE. Minimal (CRISA score 0 to 2), low (3 to 7), moderate (8 to 10) and high (≥11) risk categories were identified, corresponding to 0.5%, 3.2%, 7.9%, and 16.7% risk of SAE, respectfully. In conclusion, the CRISA score reliably predicts risk of SAE in adults with congenital heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterization and may be useful for preprocedural risk assessment.
AB - The purpose of this study was to define the risk for adults with congenital heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterization and to propose a precatheterization risk scoring system. Data were prospectively collected using a multicenter registry of the Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium. The occurrence of serious adverse events (SAE) was correlated with 12 predefined variables. Catheterization RISk in Adult patients (CRISA) score was derived using multivariate logistic regression with backward elimination model selection method. The CRISA score was compared with the American Society of Anesthesiology score and a consensus-derived, 20-point risk score based on their ability to predict SAE. From June 2008 to September 2017, 300 adjudicated SAE's occurred in 7317 catheterization procedures (overall SAE rate 4.1%) performed in adults over 18 years of age at 27 contributing centers. Nine of the 12 tested variables were ultimately included in the CRISA score. CRISA score positively correlated with risk of SAE, and was superior to American Society of Anesthesiology and the 20-point risk score in predicting SAE. Minimal (CRISA score 0 to 2), low (3 to 7), moderate (8 to 10) and high (≥11) risk categories were identified, corresponding to 0.5%, 3.2%, 7.9%, and 16.7% risk of SAE, respectfully. In conclusion, the CRISA score reliably predicts risk of SAE in adults with congenital heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterization and may be useful for preprocedural risk assessment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061705145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.042
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 30797558
AN - SCOPUS:85061705145
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 123
SP - 1527
EP - 1531
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 9
ER -