TY - JOUR
T1 - A genetic risk score combining 32 SNPs is associated with body mass index and improves obesity prediction in people with major depressive disorder
AU - Hung, Chi Fa
AU - Breen, Gerome
AU - Czamara, Darina
AU - Corre, Tanguy
AU - Wolf, Christiane
AU - Kloiber, Stefan
AU - Bergmann, Sven
AU - Craddock, Nick
AU - Gill, Michael
AU - Holsboer, Florian
AU - Jones, Lisa
AU - Jones, Ian
AU - Korszun, Ania
AU - Kutalik, Zoltan
AU - Lucae, Susanne
AU - Maier, Wolfgang
AU - Mors, Ole
AU - Owen, Michael J.
AU - Rice, John
AU - Rietschel, Marcella
AU - Uher, Rudolf
AU - Vollenweider, Peter
AU - Waeber, Gerard
AU - Craig, Ian W.
AU - Farmer, Anne E.
AU - Lewis, Cathryn M.
AU - Müller-Myhsok, Bertram
AU - Preisig, Martin
AU - McGuffin, Peter
AU - Rivera, Margarita
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Hung et al.; licensee BioMed Central.
PY - 2015/4/17
Y1 - 2015/4/17
N2 - Background: Obesity is strongly associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and various other diseases. Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple risk loci robustly associated with body mass index (BMI). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether a genetic risk score (GRS) combining multiple BMI risk loci might have utility in prediction of obesity in patients with MDD. Methods: Linear and logistic regression models were conducted to predict BMI and obesity, respectively, in three independent large case-control studies of major depression (Radiant, GSK-Munich, PsyCoLaus). The analyses were first performed in the whole sample and then separately in depressed cases and controls. An unweighted GRS was calculated by summation of the number of risk alleles. A weighted GRS was calculated as the sum of risk alleles at each locus multiplied by their effect sizes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the discriminatory ability of predictors of obesity. Results: In the discovery phase, a total of 2,521 participants (1,895 depressed patients and 626 controls) were included from the Radiant study. Both unweighted and weighted GRS were highly associated with BMI (P <0.001) but explained only a modest amount of variance. Adding 'traditional' risk factors to GRS significantly improved the predictive ability with the area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC analysis, increasing from 0.58 to 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68; Χ2=27.68; P <0.0001). Although there was no formal evidence of interaction between depression status and GRS, there was further improvement in AUC in the ROC analysis when depression status was added to the model (AUC=0.71; 95% CI, 0.68-0.73; Χ2=28.64; P <0.0001). We further found that the GRS accounted for more variance of BMI in depressed patients than in healthy controls. Again, GRS discriminated obesity better in depressed patients compared to healthy controls. We later replicated these analyses in two independent samples (GSK-Munich and PsyCoLaus) and found similar results. Conclusions: A GRS proved to be a highly significant predictor of obesity in people with MDD but accounted for only modest amount of variance. Nevertheless, as more risk loci are identified, combining a GRS approach with information on non-genetic risk factors could become a useful strategy in identifying MDD patients at higher risk of developing obesity.
AB - Background: Obesity is strongly associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and various other diseases. Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple risk loci robustly associated with body mass index (BMI). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether a genetic risk score (GRS) combining multiple BMI risk loci might have utility in prediction of obesity in patients with MDD. Methods: Linear and logistic regression models were conducted to predict BMI and obesity, respectively, in three independent large case-control studies of major depression (Radiant, GSK-Munich, PsyCoLaus). The analyses were first performed in the whole sample and then separately in depressed cases and controls. An unweighted GRS was calculated by summation of the number of risk alleles. A weighted GRS was calculated as the sum of risk alleles at each locus multiplied by their effect sizes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the discriminatory ability of predictors of obesity. Results: In the discovery phase, a total of 2,521 participants (1,895 depressed patients and 626 controls) were included from the Radiant study. Both unweighted and weighted GRS were highly associated with BMI (P <0.001) but explained only a modest amount of variance. Adding 'traditional' risk factors to GRS significantly improved the predictive ability with the area under the curve (AUC) in the ROC analysis, increasing from 0.58 to 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.68; Χ2=27.68; P <0.0001). Although there was no formal evidence of interaction between depression status and GRS, there was further improvement in AUC in the ROC analysis when depression status was added to the model (AUC=0.71; 95% CI, 0.68-0.73; Χ2=28.64; P <0.0001). We further found that the GRS accounted for more variance of BMI in depressed patients than in healthy controls. Again, GRS discriminated obesity better in depressed patients compared to healthy controls. We later replicated these analyses in two independent samples (GSK-Munich and PsyCoLaus) and found similar results. Conclusions: A GRS proved to be a highly significant predictor of obesity in people with MDD but accounted for only modest amount of variance. Nevertheless, as more risk loci are identified, combining a GRS approach with information on non-genetic risk factors could become a useful strategy in identifying MDD patients at higher risk of developing obesity.
KW - Body mass index
KW - Genetic risk score
KW - Major depressive disorder
KW - Obesity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928544973&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12916-015-0334-3
DO - 10.1186/s12916-015-0334-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 25903154
AN - SCOPUS:84928544973
SN - 1741-7015
VL - 13
JO - BMC Medicine
JF - BMC Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 86
ER -