A fully magnetically levitated circulatory pump for advanced heart failure

  • Mandeep R. Mehra
  • , Yoshifumi Naka
  • , Nir Uriel
  • , Daniel J. Goldstein
  • , Joseph C. Cleveland
  • , Paolo C. Colombo
  • , Mary N. Walsh
  • , Carmelo A. Milano
  • , Chetan B. Patel
  • , Ulrich P. Jorde
  • , Francis D. Pagani
  • , Keith D. Aaronson
  • , David A. Dean
  • , Kelly McCants
  • , Akinobu Itoh
  • , Gregory A. Ewald
  • , Douglas Horstmanshof
  • , James W. Long
  • , Christopher Salerno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND Continuous-flow left ventricular assist systems increase the rate of survival among patients with advanced heart failure but are associated with the development of pump thrombosis. We investigated the effects of a new magnetically levitated centrifugal continuous-flow pump that was engineered to avert thrombosis. METHODS We randomly assigned patients with advanced heart failure to receive either the new centrifugal continuous-flow pump or a commercially available axial continuous-flow pump. Patients could be enrolled irrespective of the intended goal of pump support (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The primary end point was a composite of survival free of disabling stroke (with disabling stroke indicated by a modified Rankin score >3; scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) or survival free of reoperation to replace or remove the device at 6 months after implantation. The trial was powered for noninferiority testing of the primary end point (noninferiority margin, -10 percentage points). RESULTS Of 294 patients, 152 were assigned to the centrifugal-flow pump group and 142 to the axial-flow pump group. In the intention-To-Treat population, the primary end point occurred in 131 patients (86.2%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group and in 109 (76.8%) in the axial-flow pump group (absolute difference, 9.4 percentage points; 95% lower confidence boundary, -2.1 [P<0.001 for noninferiority]; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.95 [two-Tailed P = 0.04 for superiority]). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of death or disabling stroke, but reoperation for pump malfunction was less frequent in the centrifugal- flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (1 [0.7%] vs. 11 [7.7%]; hazard ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.60; P = 0.002). Suspected or confirmed pump thrombosis occurred in no patients in the centrifugal-flow pump group and in 14 patients (10.1%) in the axial-flow pump group. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with advanced heart failure, implantation of a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow pump was associated with better outcomes at 6 months than was implantation of an axial-flow pump, primarily because of the lower rate of reoperation for pump malfunction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)440-450
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume376
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A fully magnetically levitated circulatory pump for advanced heart failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this