Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Feminist Defense of Political Liberalism

  • Christie Hartley
  • , Lori Watson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Some feminists claim that liberal theories lack the resources necessary for fully diagnosing and remedying the social subordination of persons as members of social groups. Part of the problem is that liberals focus too narrowly on the state as the locus of political power. However, equal citizenship is also affected by systems of power that operate in the background culture and that construct social hierarchies in which persons are subordinated as members of social groups. This chapter argues that political liberalism, properly understood, entails a commitment to substantive equality such that it has the internal resources to address the kinds of inequality produced by unjust forms of social power. Although some will claim that if the basic structure is the subject of justice, political liberalism will still fall short of securing gender justice, we explain why this worry is misplaced.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationJohn Rawls
Subtitle of host publicationDebating the Major Questions
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages249-262
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9780190859220
ISBN (Print)9780190859213
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Keywords

  • basic structure
  • citizenship
  • family
  • feminism
  • gender justice
  • political liberalism
  • Rawls
  • reciprocity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Feminist Defense of Political Liberalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this