A decade of living lobar lung transplantation: Recipient outcomes

  • Vaughn A. Starnes
  • , Michael E. Bowdish
  • , Marlyn S. Woo
  • , Richard G. Barbers
  • , Felicia A. Schenkel
  • , Monica V. Horn
  • , Renzo Pessotto
  • , Eric M. Sievers
  • , Craig J. Baker
  • , Robbin G. Cohen
  • , Ross M. Bremner
  • , Winfield J. Wells
  • , Mark L. Barr
  • , G. Alexander Patterson
  • , Soon J. Park
  • , Fred A. Crawford
  • , Magdi H. Yacoub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

148 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Living lobar lung transplantation was developed as a procedure for patients considered too ill to await cadaveric transplantation. Methods: One hundred twenty-eight living lobar lung transplantations were performed in 123 patients between 1993 and 2003. Eighty-four patients were adults (age, 27 ± 7.7 years), and 39 were pediatric patients (age, 13.9 ± 2.9 years). Results: The primary indication for transplantation was cystic fibrosis (84%). At the time of transplantation, 67.5% of patients were hospitalized, and 17.9% were intubated. One-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival among living lobar recipients was 70%, 54%, and 45%, respectively. There was no difference in actuarial survival between adult and pediatric living lobar recipients (P = .65). There were 63 deaths among living lobar recipients, with infection being the predominant cause (53.4%), followed by obliterative bronchiolitis (12.7%) and primary graft dysfunction (7.9%). The overall incidence of acute rejection was 0.8 episodes per patient. Seventy-eight percent of rejection episodes were unilateral. Age, sex, indication, donor relationship, preoperative hospitalization status, use of preoperative steroids, and HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR typing did not influence survival. However, patients on ventilators preoperatively had significantly worse outcomes (odds ratio, 3.06, P = .03; Kaplan-Meier P = .002), and those undergoing retransplantation had an increased risk of death (odds ratio, 2.50). Conclusion: These results support the continued use of living lobar lung transplantation in patients deemed unable to await a cadaveric transplantation. We consider patients undergoing retransplantations and intubated patients to be at significantly high risk because of the poor outcomes in these populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)114-122
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume127
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A decade of living lobar lung transplantation: Recipient outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this