Abstract
Meta-analysis is an increasingly popular, objective method for summarizing a body of empirical findings. The standard meta-analysis package consists of methods for estimating the combined probability and average effect size for a set of studies, the stability of these results, and the factors associated with differential treatment outcomes. While meta-analysis is a powerful analytic technique, the procedure has limitations that should be carefully evaluated when it is applied to the psychotherapy -or any other- literature. These limitations include biased selection of studies; reporting inaccuracies, poor quality data, various sources of invalidity (conceptual, methodological, and statistical), and lack of independence in the studies reviewed; and variability in outcome prodcued by the meta-analytic techniques employed. Despite these potential problems, the advantages of meta-analysis are so substantial that the techniques deserve routine use as an aid to summarizing treatment literatures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 129-139 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | British Journal of Clinical Psychology |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1982 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A critical appraisal of meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver