A critical appraisal of meta-analysis

M. J. Strube, D. P. Hartmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Scopus citations

Abstract

Meta-analysis is an increasingly popular, objective method for summarizing a body of empirical findings. The standard meta-analysis package consists of methods for estimating the combined probability and average effect size for a set of studies, the stability of these results, and the factors associated with differential treatment outcomes. While meta-analysis is a powerful analytic technique, the procedure has limitations that should be carefully evaluated when it is applied to the psychotherapy -or any other- literature. These limitations include biased selection of studies; reporting inaccuracies, poor quality data, various sources of invalidity (conceptual, methodological, and statistical), and lack of independence in the studies reviewed; and variability in outcome prodcued by the meta-analytic techniques employed. Despite these potential problems, the advantages of meta-analysis are so substantial that the techniques deserve routine use as an aid to summarizing treatment literatures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-139
Number of pages11
JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical appraisal of meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this