TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparison of treatment strategies for hypoplastic left heart syndrome using decision analysis
AU - Jenkins, Pamela C.
AU - Flanagan, Michael F.
AU - Sargent, James D.
AU - Canter, Charles E.
AU - Chinnock, Richard E.
AU - Jenkins, Kathy J.
AU - Vincent, Robert N.
AU - O'Connor, Gerald T.
AU - Tosteson, Anna N.A.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the optimal treatment strategy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of HLHS involves either transplantation (Tx) or staged palliation of the native heart. Identifying the best treatment for HLHS requires integrating individual patient risk factors and center-specific data. METHODS: Decision analysis is a modeling technique used to compare six strategies: staged surgery; Tx; stage 1 surgery as an interim to Tx; and listing for transplant for one, two, or three months before performing staged surgery if a donor is unavailable. Probabilities were derived from current literature and a dataset of 231 patients with HLHS born between 1989 and 1994. The goal was to maximize first-year survival. RESULTS: If a donor is available within one month, Tx is the optimal choice, given baseline probabilities; if no donor is found by the end of one month, stage 1 surgery should be performed. When survival and organ donation probabilities were varied, staged surgery was the optimal choice for centers with organ donation rates <10% in three months and with stage 1 mortality <20%. Waiting one month on the transplant list optimized survival when the three-month organ donation rate was ≥30%. Performing stage 1 surgery before listing, or performing stage 1 surgery after an unsuccessful two- or three-month wait for transplant, were almost never optimal choices. CONCLUSIONS: The best strategy for centers that treat patients with HLHS should be guided by local organ availability, stage 1 surgical mortality and patient risk factors.
AB - OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the optimal treatment strategy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of HLHS involves either transplantation (Tx) or staged palliation of the native heart. Identifying the best treatment for HLHS requires integrating individual patient risk factors and center-specific data. METHODS: Decision analysis is a modeling technique used to compare six strategies: staged surgery; Tx; stage 1 surgery as an interim to Tx; and listing for transplant for one, two, or three months before performing staged surgery if a donor is unavailable. Probabilities were derived from current literature and a dataset of 231 patients with HLHS born between 1989 and 1994. The goal was to maximize first-year survival. RESULTS: If a donor is available within one month, Tx is the optimal choice, given baseline probabilities; if no donor is found by the end of one month, stage 1 surgery should be performed. When survival and organ donation probabilities were varied, staged surgery was the optimal choice for centers with organ donation rates <10% in three months and with stage 1 mortality <20%. Waiting one month on the transplant list optimized survival when the three-month organ donation rate was ≥30%. Performing stage 1 surgery before listing, or performing stage 1 surgery after an unsuccessful two- or three-month wait for transplant, were almost never optimal choices. CONCLUSIONS: The best strategy for centers that treat patients with HLHS should be guided by local organ availability, stage 1 surgical mortality and patient risk factors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034806664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01505-4
DO - 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01505-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 11583901
AN - SCOPUS:0034806664
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 38
SP - 1181
EP - 1187
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 4
ER -