Abstract
In the modern theory of growth, monopoly plays a crucial role both as a cause and an effect of innovation. Innovative firms, it is argued, would have insufficient incentive to innovate should the prospect of monopoly power not be present. This theme of monopoly runs throughout the theory of growth, international trade, and industrial organization. We argue that monopoly is neither needed for, nor a necessary consequence of innovation. In particular, intellectual property is not necessary for, and may hurt more than help, innovation and growth. We argue that, as a practical matter, it is more likely to hurt.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 327-350 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | International Economic Review |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '2003 Lawrence R. Klein lecture the case against intellectual monopoly'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver